Clinical Whitepaper · Series No. 38

The Lateral Partner Attrition Report: The Mental-Health Cost of Law-Firm Turnover

What partner movement actually costs law firms, and the clinical strain that drives it.

21 min read · 4,613 words · 4 figures · 18 references

Martha Fernandez, LCSW Co-Founder & Psychotherapist Updated October 2026
Topic · Attorney Wellbeing For · Law Firm Leadership Evidence-led v2.0
00Executive summaryContents ↑

Executive summary

Lateral partner movement is now a permanent feature of the legal market, with thousands of partners changing firms every year.7 Most of that movement is read as a recruiting and revenue problem, and it is. But underneath the spreadsheets sits a population carrying documented rates of depression, anxiety, and problematic drinking well above general-population norms,1 and the strain that pushes a partner out the door is rarely addressed before the resignation letter lands. This report treats lateral partner attrition as both a financial event and a clinical one.

Circumstances

Sustained billable pressure, originations targets, and a culture that rewards stoicism produce chronic, concealed strain in exactly the partners a firm most wants to keep.

Challenge

Firm assistance programs and insurance-based referrals carry a confidentiality and stigma cost that high-visibility partners will not pay, and they rarely fit around a partner's hours, so most never use them.

Solution

What works is confidential, private-pay, senior-clinician care matched to the realities of partnership, accessed before strain becomes departure.

Result

Firms that make discreet clinical support genuinely available protect the relationships, the books of business, and the people that lateral churn otherwise destroys.

01The problemContents ↑

The problemPartners leave firms long after they have stopped being well.§

In the largest study of its kind, 28% of licensed, employed attorneys screened positive for depression, 19% for anxiety, and 23% for stress, while 20.6% screened positive for problematic drinking, well above general-population norms.1,2 The sample was 12,825 attorneys across 19 states.1,3 Distress was highest earliest in a career: junior associates screened at 31.1% for problematic drinking, and attorneys with ten years of experience or less at 28.1%.1 These are the people firms spend a decade developing into partners.

The usual framing treats a partner departure as a compensation or culture miss, something a counteroffer or a town hall can fix. It misses that the partner most likely to leave is often the one quietly managing strain no one at the firm can see. In Bloomberg Law's 2024 well-being report, attorneys said they felt burned out 48% of the time on average, attorneys aged 25 to 34 said 58% of the time, and one in four said their well-being had worsened since the start of the year.5 By the time a resignation is on the table, the clinical signal that preceded it has usually been visible for a long while to no one.

By the time a partner resigns, the firm is paying to replace a relationship it could have protected for a fraction of the cost. CEREVITY Clinical Whitepaper, Series No. 38
02What the evidence showsContents ↑

The evidenceWhat the research shows§

Four numbers frame the scale of the problem: how often lateral partners leave, how often they fail to deliver the business they promised, what one departure costs to replace, and the size of the evidence base behind the clinical claims. Each is drawn from a named, dated source.

48%

of lateral partners leave their new firm within five years, wiping out the integration investment.9,12

Decipher Investigative Intelligence

62%

of lateral partners fail to bring the book of business they promised at hire.9,11

Decipher, 2021

$200k+

low end of the estimated cost to replace a single associate, before lost client revenue.13

NALP Foundation, 2017

12,825

attorneys in the landmark study documenting depression, anxiety, and problematic drinking.1

Krill, Johnson & Albert, 2016

Read together, these figures describe a market that spends heavily to acquire partners who frequently do not perform as projected and often leave within a few years, drawn from a population carrying an unusually high clinical burden, a picture the newer research on lawyer distress has only sharpened. The lateral hiring machine treats partners as portable revenue. The evidence says they are people under measurable strain, and that strain is both a cause of the departures firms pay so dearly to manage and the thing least often addressed before they happen. It also falls hardest on the youngest lawyers in the pipeline, the cohort that large-firm burnout data keeps returning to.

Figure 1 · Screening prevalence among U.S. attorneysProblematic drinking peaks in the first decade of practice, the same years in which firms build their partner pipeline. Share of 12,825 licensed, employed attorneys screening positive on each measure.
0%20%40%Drinking, junior assoc.Drinking, junior assoc.: 31.1%31.1%Drinking, 0 to 10 yrsDrinking, 0 to 10 yrs: 28.1%28.1%DepressionDepression: 28%28%StressStress: 23%23%Drinking, all attorneysDrinking, all attorneys: 20.6%20.6%AnxietyAnxiety: 19%19%

01, 02 Krill, Johnson & Albert (2016), Journal of Addiction Medicine. AUDIT and DASS-21 screening, not clinical diagnosis.

Table 1. Lateral movement, failure, and clinical strain, by source
Dimension Figure Population / scope Source, Year
Lateral partner moves, 20223,633 movesU.S. lateral partner marketAmerican Lawyer, via Legal.io, 20247
Laterals exiting within five years48%Lateral partner hiresDecipher9,12
Laterals failing to bring promised book62%Lateral partner hiresDecipher, 20219,11
Lateral hires recouping cost of acquisitionUnder 10%Lateral hiresDecipher, 202111
Cost to replace an associate$200k to $500kPer departureNALP Foundation, 201713,14
Problematic drinking, junior associates31.1%n=964Krill, Johnson & Albert, 20161
Average share of time burned out48%Attorneys, second half of 2023Bloomberg Law, 20245
Figure 2 · The gender gap in strain and attritionOn every measure the gap runs the same way: women attorneys report more strain and are more likely to consider leaving. Each row compares men and women on one published measure: considered leaving the profession over mental health, 2024 associate attrition, worsened well-being, share of working time burned out, and risky drinking on the AUDIT-C.
MenWomen
0%20%40%60%Considered leavingConsidered leaving, Men: 17.4%Considered leaving, Women: 24.2%Associate attritionAssociate attrition, Men: 20%Associate attrition, Women: 22%Well-being worsenedWell-being worsened, Men: 21%Well-being worsened, Women: 30%Time burned outTime burned out, Men: 41%Time burned out, Women: 53%Risky drinkingRisky drinking, Men: 46.4%Risky drinking, Women: 55.9%

04, 05, 16 Anker & Krill (2021), PLOS ONE, n=2,863: contemplated leaving and risky drinking.
Bloomberg Law (2024): burnout share of time and worsened well-being.
NALP Foundation via ABA Journal (2025): associate attrition, calendar year 2024.

03The Concealed-Strain Departure ModelContents ↑

The frameworkA model you can name and own§

A named model gives firm leaders a shared vocabulary for something they usually only notice at the end. Partner departures driven by strain are not sudden; they move through recognizable phases, and each phase offers a different, cheaper point of intervention than the one that follows. The model below describes how a high-performing partner moves from quiet overload to exit. The phases are clinical observations made general, not a diagnosis of any one person.

CEREVITY model

The Concealed-Strain Departure Model

A four-phase description of how a high-performing partner moves from manageable overload toward departure. The stronger the partner, the longer the strain stays invisible, and the more expensive the eventual exit. Each phase names a pattern a managing partner, a colleague, or the partner themselves can recognize.

1

Overload

Billing, originations, and management load stack up. Output holds, but recovery time disappears first. Nothing visible has broken yet, and that is exactly why it is missed.

2

Concealment

The partner manages the strain privately and becomes expert at appearing fine. In a profession that rewards stoicism, concealment is a skill, and it delays the partner's own recognition as much as the firm's.

3

Disengagement

Sleep, attention, and relationships degrade in sequence. The partner still defends the numbers, but begins quietly taking recruiter calls. Commitment erodes before performance does.

4

Exit

A threshold is crossed and the partner leaves, often with a book of business and a team. By this point the firm is managing a costly departure rather than a treatable strain, and the relationship it spent years building moves to a competitor.

Figure 3 · The Concealed-Strain Departure ModelSchematic, not measured data. Strain rises steadily while the firm sees almost none of it until the exit, which is why the cheapest intervention points are the least visible ones.
Strain the partner carriesStrain visible to the firm
050100Overload: 8Concealment: 12Disengagement: 30Exit: 95Overload: 40Concealment: 60Disengagement: 78Exit: 92OverloadConcealmentDisengagementExitIndex

SCHEMATIC Schematic, not measured data.
CEREVITY conceptual model. Illustrative shape only.

The decision the model asks of a firm is simple: where do you want to meet your partners? At Overload, a confidential conversation, and where it is needed therapy for executive burnout, can change the trajectory. At Exit, you are negotiating a counteroffer against a clinical problem that money does not solve. Earlier recognition is the entire point.

04How it presents, by professionContents ↑

By professionHow it presents across roles§

Strain and attrition do not fall evenly across a partnership. Seniority, equity status, and gender each change both the pressure a partner carries and the likelihood that pressure turns into a departure. The three groups below show how the same underlying pattern presents differently across a firm.

Senior associates and income partners on the partnership track

This is the highest-risk cohort, and the one firms invest in most heavily before they ever generate partner-level returns. In the landmark prevalence study, problematic drinking was highest among junior associates at 31.1% and among attorneys with ten years of experience or less at 28.1%, with more senior positions associated with significantly lower distress scores.1 Bloomberg Law's 2024 report found attorneys aged 25 to 34 feeling burned out 58% of the time, the highest of any age group, and among mid-level associates who reported anxiety or depression, six in ten had been medically diagnosed.5 These are the lawyers carrying the heaviest billable load while auditioning for equity, which is precisely the combination of high effort and high uncertainty that produces concealed strain. Income partners sit one step further along the same path: 60% of non-equity partners reported being satisfied with their compensation, against 80% of equity partners.17,18 A firm that loses a partner-track senior associate or a newly minted income partner loses a decade of training and the future originations that justified it. The clinical reading is that this group is both the most strained and the most reachable, because the strain is still ahead of the departure rather than behind it, and a confidential conversation at this stage costs a fraction of a replacement hire.

Individual therapy for attorneys
Organizational an attorney wellness program associates actually use

Equity partners

Equity partners screen lower on distress than their juniors,1 but they carry a different and underappreciated load: origination targets, management responsibility, and the firm's most valuable client relationships. Average AmLaw 200 partner compensation reached about $1.4 million, with a median of $800,000, after a 26% rise in two years, and equity partners reported average originations of almost $5 million, more than four times those of non-equity partners.17,18 That portable book is exactly what makes an equity partner's strain financially dangerous to a firm. When an equity partner leaves, the book often leaves too, and the data on lateral economics shows how hard that revenue is to recover: 62% of lateral partners fail to bring the book they promised, 90% of laterals have trouble generating business at their new firm, and fewer than 10% of lateral hires recoup the cost of their acquisition.11,12 The senior partner who looks steadiest on a well-being survey can still be the one quietly fielding recruiter calls. For this group, the clinical observation at network level is not high prevalence but high stakes: lower baseline distress, far larger consequences when strain does tip into departure, and the strongest incentive of any cohort to keep that strain invisible, because their standing inside the partnership rests on looking unshakable.

Individual confidential therapy for owners
Organizational confidential therapy for equity partners

Women partners

Women in the profession carry the same workload and a measurably higher risk of leaving because of it. In a 2021 study of 2,863 attorneys, 24% of women reported having contemplated leaving the profession because of mental-health problems, burnout, or stress, against 17% of men, and women screened higher for anxiety, stress, and risky drinking.4 Associate attrition data shows women departing at modestly higher rates than men, 22% against 20% in 2024, and associates of color higher still.15,16 Bloomberg Law's 2024 report found women attorneys feeling burned out 53% of the time against 41% for men, and 30% saying their well-being had worsened against 21% of men.5 The pattern for this group is a compounding one: equal or greater strain, a higher stated intention to leave, and more of that strain carried in private. The clinical observation at network level is that interventions which protect confidentiality matter even more here, because the strain is more likely to be carried silently and the consequences of a departure, both human and financial, are larger. Firms serious about partner retention cannot treat this as a separate diversity initiative; it is the same strain problem, presenting with sharper edges. Any support a firm offers has to be usable by a woman partner without it becoming known inside the firm, or it will not be used at all.

Individual therapy for high-achieving women
Organizational EAP alternative for law firms

05The cost of inactionContents ↑

The stakesThe cost of inaction§

A firm measures attrition in three ledgers: what it costs to replace the person, what walks out the door with them, and what happens to everyone left behind. Strain-driven departures hit all three, and the largest line is rarely the one on the recruiting invoice.

Replacement and recruiting cost

The direct cost of replacing a departed associate runs from $200,000 to $500,000, by the NALP Foundation's estimate.13,14 At the partner level the figure climbs sharply: acquiring a lateral partner cost an average of about $2.3 million in 2018, counting recruiter fees and first-year compensation, and about $4.2 million once a typical two-year package is included.10 Every one of these dollars is spent reacting to a departure that earlier intervention might have prevented.

Lost client revenue and book of business

The replacement invoice is the smaller number. When a partner leaves, the relationships often leave too. Sixty-two percent of laterals fail to bring their promised book, 90% have trouble generating business at their new firm, and fewer than 10% of lateral hires recoup their cost of acquisition.11,12 Decipher and ALM Intelligence put the overall lateral failure rate close to 50%.8 With equity partners averaging almost $5 million in originations,17 a single departure puts seven figures of annual revenue at risk, and that revenue frequently lands at a competitor rather than being recovered internally.

Productivity, morale, and the people who stay

Attrition compounds. A departure redistributes work onto colleagues who already report feeling burned out almost half the time.5 Disrupted sleep affected 56% of surveyed attorneys, and among those reporting anxiety or depression, four in ten were medically diagnosed.5,6 Each exit raises the load, and the strain, on the people most likely to leave next, which is how one resignation becomes a pattern. The morale cost does not appear on any invoice, but it compounds faster than the financial one.

Figure 4 · What one departure costs to replaceReplacing a partner costs several times what replacing an associate does, before any lost book of business is counted. Dollars per departure, one shared axis.
Associate, lowAssociate, low: 0.2 million USD0.2 million USDNALP Foundation 2017 estimate, low endAssociate, highAssociate, high: 0.5 million USD0.5 million USDNALP Foundation 2017 estimate, high endLateral partnerLateral partner: 2.3 million USD2.3 million USDAverage acquisition cost, 2018, recruiter fees and first-year payLateral, 2 yrs payLateral, 2 yrs pay: 4.2 million USD4.2 million USDAverage including a typical two-year compensation package

10, 13 NALP Foundation (2017) via Lateral Link: associate replacement cost.
Decipher Investigative Intelligence (2019): lateral partner acquisition cost.

06What effective care looks likeContents ↑

The solutionWhat effective care looks like§

Good care for partners has to clear three bars that ordinary referral pathways do not. It must be genuinely confidential, because a partner with client-facing visibility will not risk a record that could surface inside the firm or through insurance. It must be delivered by clinicians who understand partnership pressure, originations math, and the stoicism the profession trains in, so the partner does not spend the first month explaining their world. And it must be reachable before strain becomes departure, on a schedule that bends around a litigation calendar rather than the other way around. Anything that fails one of these bars is a service partners admire in principle and never actually use.

CEREVITY is built around those bars. It is a nationwide network of independent licensed clinicians, matched to the person rather than assigned by a panel, delivered by secure video, on a private-pay basis that keeps the work confidential and outside any insurance or firm record; the approach behind this model starts from the partner's actual calendar and stakes. Sessions run in three formats: a 50-minute standard session, a 90-minute extended session, and a 3-hour intensive for periods of acute load. The model is designed for exactly the partner who would never walk into an employee assistance program, and to be reachable at Overload rather than at Exit.

07ImplementationContents ↑

ImplementationHow to put it into practice§

A firm cannot mandate that partners take care of their mental health, and should not try. What it can do is remove every barrier between a strained partner and confidential help, and signal that using it is a sign of judgment rather than weakness. The four steps below are a practical sequence any firm can run.

  1. 01

    Make access confidential and frictionless

    Offer a private-pay clinical resource that sits entirely outside the firm's benefits record and HR file. No diagnosis code, no shared chart, no internal visibility. The single largest barrier for senior lawyers is the fear of a record, and removing it is the precondition for everything else. A first step can be as small as one standard 50-minute session booked privately.

  2. 02

    Normalize it from the top

    Strain support is used when leadership treats it as ordinary maintenance, not crisis response. When managing partners speak about clinical care the way they speak about executive coaching or physical health, the stigma that keeps the highest-strain partners away begins to dissolve.

  3. 03

    Match intervention to the phase

    Use the Concealed-Strain Departure Model as a shared language. Build moments where Overload and Concealment can be named early, in stay conversations and partner check-ins, rather than waiting for the Exit phase when only a counteroffer is left and it rarely works. For a partner already at Disengagement, an extended 90-minute session leaves room for the decision an hour keeps interrupting.

  4. 04

    Measure retention, not utilization

    Judge the program by whether the partners you most wanted to keep are still here in three years, not by how many sessions were booked. Confidential care produces no usage report by design, so the right metric is partner retention and the cost of departures avoided, tracked against the firm's own lateral-attrition baseline.

08RecommendationsContents ↑

RecommendationsWhere to start§

Clinical

Screen for strain, not just satisfaction

Engagement surveys miss the concealing partner. Build confidential, clinically informed check-ins that can surface depression, anxiety, and problematic drinking, which the evidence shows affect a substantial share of attorneys,1 and offer anxiety and depression therapy before any of it presents as a resignation.

Clinical

Offer care senior partners will actually use

Provide confidential therapy built for law firm partners, private-pay and delivered by senior clinicians who understand partnership. The single non-negotiable is that it leaves no record a partner has to worry about, because that fear is what keeps the highest-strain partners away from every existing program.

Structural

Treat attrition as a clinical risk metric

Track lateral departures against your own baseline and read spikes as a possible strain signal, not only a compensation one. With 48% of laterals leaving within five years and fewer than 10% of lateral hires recouping their cost, the financial case for earlier intervention is already made.9,11

Structural

Protect the book by protecting the person

The portable book that makes a partner valuable is the same book that walks when they leave. Investing in discreet clinical support before the Exit phase is materially cheaper than recruiting against a departed partner's relationships, which the data shows firms rarely recover.11

09Frequently asked questionsContents ↑

FAQCommon questions§

Is lateral partner attrition really a mental-health issue, or just a market for talent?
It is both, and the two are connected. Lateral movement is driven by compensation and opportunity, but the documented clinical burden in the profession, 28% of attorneys screening positive for depression and 20.6% for problematic drinking in the landmark study, means a meaningful share of departures are preceded by strain that was never addressed.1 Treating attrition only as a market problem misses a cause a firm can actually influence earlier and more cheaply.
Why will partners not use the wellbeing programs firms already offer?
Time, self-reliance, and visibility. In Bloomberg Law's 2024 survey, more than 40% of attorneys had delayed or not sought mental-health treatment they believed would help; lack of time was the most common reason, followed by a belief that they could handle it themselves, and fewer than one in five of those who delayed pointed to stigma or professional fear.5 For a partner with major client relationships, the visibility concern sits on top of the time problem: many will not risk a record inside the firm, the benefits file, or insurance, or be seen using an internal program at all. Programs that cannot offer real privacy on a partner's schedule go mostly unused by the people who need them most.
What does the cost of one partner departure actually look like?
At minimum, $200,000 to $500,000 to replace a single associate, and an average of about $2.3 million to acquire a replacement lateral partner.10,13 That is before the lost book of business: 62% of laterals fail to bring their promised book and fewer than 10% of lateral hires recoup their acquisition cost, so the revenue a departing partner carries away is rarely recovered.11 The full cost of one partner exit routinely runs to seven figures.
How does private-pay billing work?
CEREVITY operates on a fully private-pay basis. Fees are presented in plain terms before any session is booked, and billing is completed before scheduling. This keeps care free of insurance constraints and protects the confidentiality of the record.
How is my privacy protected?
Sessions are delivered over secure video. Records are held by the treating clinician under their own professional and legal obligations, and information is not shared without your direction except where the law requires it.
10Methodology and referencesContents ↑

MethodologyHow this paper was built§

Methodology

This report synthesizes peer-reviewed research, professional-association surveys, and legal-industry market data published between 2016 and 2025. Sources were identified through searches of PubMed and Google Scholar for attorney mental-health prevalence, and through the published research of the NALP Foundation, Bloomberg Law, Major Lindsey & Africa, the American Lawyer, and Decipher Investigative Intelligence for lateral-market and turnover-cost data. The clinical prevalence figures rest primarily on Krill, Johnson and Albert (2016), a study of 12,825 licensed, employed U.S. attorneys across 19 states published in the Journal of Addiction Medicine, which used the AUDIT and DASS-21 instruments; its headline findings of 28% depression, 19% anxiety, 23% stress, and 20.6% problematic drinking are screening prevalences, not clinical diagnoses, and should be read as such. Gender-specific findings draw on Anker and Krill (2021), a study of 2,863 attorneys in PLOS ONE. Well-being and burnout figures draw on the Bloomberg Law 2024 Attorney Well-Being Report, which combines a survey of nearly 1,400 legal professionals on the second half of 2023 with a 2024 well-being survey; its burnout figures are self-reported shares of working time, not a clinical measure. Lateral-market economics, including the 48% five-year exit rate, the 62% book shortfall, the sub-10% cost-recovery rate, and the $2.3 million average acquisition cost, derive from Decipher Investigative Intelligence publications, including its 2019 Risky Business study with ALM Intelligence, as reported on Decipher's own site. Lateral move counts come from the American Lawyer's 2024 laterals report as summarized by Legal.io. Cost-to-replace figures derive from the NALP Foundation's 2017 Update on Associate Attrition as summarized by Lateral Link. Compensation and originations figures derive from the Major Lindsey & Africa 2024 Partner Compensation Survey. Several limitations apply. Survey-based prevalence relies on self-report and screening instruments, which can over- or under-state true clinical rates. Lateral-market figures come from proprietary industry studies reported through secondary summaries, and dollar anchors such as the $2.3 million acquisition estimate should be read as industry estimates rather than audited accounting. Dollar figures have not been uniformly inflation-adjusted. Where a comparison is drawn between two separate figures, it is illustrative rather than a single sourced statistic. In this October 2026 revision, two figures in the earlier edition that could not be traced to a cited source were removed, and several figures were corrected to match their sources. No CEREVITY internal client data is used in this report. Every external statistic carries a numbered citation tied to the reference list below.

References

  1. 01Krill, P. R., Johnson, R., & Albert, L. (2016). The Prevalence of Substance Use and Other Mental Health Concerns Among American Attorneys. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 10(1), 46 to 52. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  2. 02Krill, P. R., Johnson, R., & Albert, L. (2016). Journal of Addiction Medicine, publisher full text. doi.org
  3. 03Albert, L., & Krill, P. R. (2016). Wellness and the Legal Profession: Implications of the 2016 Landmark Study. The Bar Examiner, 85(1). thebarexaminer.ncbex.org
  4. 04Anker, J., & Krill, P. R. (2021). Stress, drink, leave: An examination of gender-specific risk factors for mental health problems and attrition among licensed attorneys. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0250563. journals.plos.org
  5. 05Bloomberg Law (2024). 2024 Attorney Well-Being Report. assets.bbhub.io
  6. 06ABA Journal (2024). Disrupted sleep and anxiety plague more than half of surveyed lawyers. abajournal.com
  7. 07Legal.io (2024). 2024 Legal Hiring Reports Indicate Lateral Hiring Trend (citing the 2024 American Lawyer Laterals Report). legal.io
  8. 08Decipher Investigative Intelligence (2019). Decipher and ALM Intelligence Release Report on Lateral Hiring. decipherintel.com
  9. 09Decipher Investigative Intelligence (n.d.). Lateral Hire Stats. decipherintel.com
  10. 10Decipher Investigative Intelligence (2019). Why Do Laterals So Often Fail? Poor Due Diligence, Researchers Say. decipherintel.com
  11. 11Decipher Investigative Intelligence (2021). Your Next Lateral: Book of Business or Short Story? decipherintel.com
  12. 12Decipher Investigative Intelligence (n.d.). More Lateral Hire Stats. decipherintel.com
  13. 13Rushing, S., Lateral Link (2022). The Cost of Law Firm Associate Turnover (citing the NALP Foundation 2017 Update on Associate Attrition). Above the Law. abovethelaw.com
  14. 14Lateral Link (2022). The Cost of Law Firm Associate Turnover. laterallink.com
  15. 15NALP Foundation (2025). Update on Associate Attrition and Hiring, Calendar Year 2024. nalpfoundation.org
  16. 16ABA Journal (2025). Attrition rate is markedly higher for associates of color, NALP Foundation says. abajournal.com
  17. 17Major, Lindsey & Africa (2024). 2024 Partner Compensation Survey. 209075.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net
  18. 18Major, Lindsey & Africa (2024). Law Firm Partner Compensation Increases by 26% Since 2022, Nearly Doubles Over the Past Decade. mlaglobal.com
Martha Fernandez, LCSW

Martha Fernandez, LCSW

Licensed Clinical Social Worker

Martha Fernandez, LCSW is Co-Founder of CEREVITY and a Licensed Clinical Social Worker licensed in California, seeing clients by telehealth nationwide through CEREVITY's network of independent licensed clinicians. USC-trained and bilingual in English and Spanish, she works with founders, executives, attorneys and pilots on burnout, anxiety and depression in high performers, on trauma, grief and high-stakes transitions, and on couples and relationship strain under pressure. Her clinical work draws on cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, behavioral activation, and narrative and solution-focused approaches. She is the author of Wired to Burn.

Talk to someone who gets it.

If this paper describes something you recognize, a confidential conversation is the next step. CEREVITY matches you to an independent licensed clinician who works with people in your position.

Schedule consultation

Private-pay, telehealth, nationwide. Questions: (562) 295-6650

If you are in crisis Call or text 988 (Suicide and Crisis Lifeline). Text HOME to 741741 (Crisis Text Line). Reach NAMI at 1-800-950-NAMI (6264). In an emergency, call 911. CEREVITY is not a crisis service. For non-urgent questions, call (562) 295-6650.
CEREVITY

A nationwide network of independent licensed clinicians. Care is private-pay and delivered by secure video. This whitepaper is for educational purposes and is not medical advice or a substitute for care from a licensed clinician.