A concierge therapist network for NYC litigation partners, with a contractual SLA on intake.
A private clinical channel for managing partners, chairs, and senior counsel at Manhattan litigation firms. Vetted clinicians fluent with trial practice and partnership dynamics. White-glove intake with a contractual response-time SLA. No firm visibility into care.
A concierge therapist network for the litigation partner tier in New York.
This page is for managing partners, executive committee chairs, and well-being committees at Manhattan litigation firms scoping a concierge channel of clinical care for partners and senior counsel. If that is you, the rest of this page is the briefing document.
CEREVITY operates as a clinical network with direct relationships between the network, the clinicians, and the partner firm. The NYC litigation network is curated for fluency with trial practice realities: trial calendars that override personal calendars, the cycle of all-in engagement followed by sudden depressurization, executive committee dynamics at top-tier litigation firms, and the specific isolation of being the senior partner who carries the matter. Partners are matched, not first-served.
Our NYC clinicians are independent licensed professionals. Many have worked with senior litigators before and understand the partnership track at top New York firms. The concierge intake is white-glove by design, with a contractual SLA on response time that is unusual in the broader behavioral health market, because the realistic engagement window for a NYC litigation partner is narrow and the friction has to be removed.
Trial-tier litigation practice is its own clinical context, distinct from transactional Big Law.
The reasons your partners do not engage with the standard EAP or the broader behavioral health network are not failures of either system. They are inherent to how those systems were scoped. The trial-tier litigation partner sits in a clinical context the broader behavioral health network was not built to absorb.
Top-tier NYC litigation partners present with a recognizable clinical profile: trial-cycle hours that compress the calendar to nothing, the all-consuming engagement of major matters that cannot be put down, executive committee and chair-level dynamics at the most demanding firms in the city, and the specific isolation of senior partnership at firms where the partner tier is small and the matters are reputation-defining.
Generalist clinicians, however skilled, often cannot absorb the trial-tier frame the partner walks in with. The partner spends the first sessions explaining the structure of a major trial, the executive committee, the lockstep or non-lockstep compensation model, and why a Sunday text from co-counsel is a structural feature rather than a boundary violation. That is orientation, not depth work, and the curated network exists to remove that conversation from the consulting room.
What changes when the network is built around the trial-tier profile: clinicians with prior experience treating senior litigators, both in-person Manhattan appointments and telehealth, session formats long enough to do real work between trial cycles, a contractual response-time SLA on intake, and a confidentiality posture that gives the firm no visibility into who has engaged.
What CEREVITY's NYC network actually treats in trial-tier partners.
The clinical scope is built around the presenting profile of NYC litigation partners and senior counsel, not the workforce-wide profile an EAP roster is built for.
Trial-cycle burnout
Twelve months of all-in engagement on a single major trial, with a sudden depressurization at verdict. The cycle, repeated across decades, produces a specific recovery deficit that the standard EAP session length cannot reach.
Origination pressure at the senior tier
At the litigation partner tier, the book drives compensation and standing in the partnership. The chronic pressure to originate and protect major-matter clients becomes its own clinical issue when it stops being seasonal.
High-functioning anxiety
Performance maintained at cost. The briefs still get filed and the closing argument still lands. The cost is invisible to the client, the firm, and the spouse until it is not. Common in chairs and senior partners carrying major-matter books.
Executive committee and chair dynamics
Practice group chair, executive committee, managing partner. The transitions into and out of these roles at top-tier litigation firms are clinical events, not just career events. The isolation of the chair dynamic is itself a treatable issue.
Identity fusion with the practice
Thirty years of being defined by the trial book means the work of separating self from role is its own clinical project. Particularly acute in the runway to of counsel transitions, retirement, and post-equity arrangements.
Imposter syndrome on elevation
The partnership vote happened. The certainty did not. Common in newly elevated litigation partners, lateral arrivals from boutiques into top firms, and counsel-to-partner transitions on the trial track.
Post-verdict integration
The cycle of all-consuming trial engagement followed by sudden depressurization at verdict has a specific clinical signature. Most litigation partners learn to manage it; some never do. The intensive session format was built partly for this.
Substance use in trial-tier context
The 2016 ABA-Hazelden study put problem drinking at 21% across the practicing bar. The trial-tier culture, with its in-trial all-hours pattern, does not lower that figure. Treatable, with appropriate referral to the New York Lawyer Assistance Program when the case warrants it.
Three session formats, each chosen for the work.
Most benefits programs offer one session length. CEREVITY offers three, because different kinds of clinical work need different amounts of time, and because trial calendars do not respect a standard hour.
The steady cadence of ongoing therapy. Most clients spend most of their care here.
For work that needs more room than a standard hour can hold.
For work that needs uninterrupted time to reach resolution.
Because CEREVITY operates outside the insurance reimbursement model, session length is set by the clinical work, not by what a payor will reimburse. That is the structural reason all three formats can exist on the same network.
Ready to scope a chair-level briefing?
Briefings are scoped to your firm. We respond personally within 48 business hours with proposed times, the SLA structure, and any prepared materials relevant to the shape you are evaluating.
Request a briefingHow a partner is matched.
Matched, not first-served. Here is the concierge process that produces the match for a NYC litigation partner, with the SLA that governs each step.
The eligible individual submits a confidential intake form covering presenting issues, modality preference, professional context, and scheduling parameters. Operated by CEREVITY, not a broker.
Intake is reviewed by CEREVITY's clinical leadership against the network's active capacity, current licensure footprint, and modality availability. The step that does not exist in an EAP.
A specific clinician is matched to the partner. They receive the match with the clinician's profile, modality, and credentials, plus a direct online scheduling link.
Scheduling runs directly through CEREVITY infrastructure. No phone handoff. First sessions are typically scheduled within 5 to 10 business days of the match.
Care continues on the cadence the clinical work requires, in 50-minute, 90-minute, or 3-hour sessions, without an employer-imposed cap.
Capability comparison for NYC Litigation Partners.
An evaluation framework on the dimensions that matter when scoping a partner-tier-tier offering for partners. Both models have a place; they are designed for different populations.
| Dimension | Typical EAP | Executive-tier platform | CEREVITY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network model | Broker layer between firm and contractor roster | Single-vendor platform, W-2 or contracted pool | Independent clinical network with direct relationships |
| Clinician assignment | First contractor to reply with availability | Algorithmic matching on intake-form inputs | Clinical review by network leadership |
| Intake and scheduling | Phone handoff to clinician's line | App-based intake and scheduling | Network-operated intake, direct online scheduling |
| Session formats | Standard 50-minute; capped session counts | Standard 45 to 50-minute sessions | 50-minute, 90-minute, and 3-hour formats, no cap |
| Clinical scope | Acute, broadly applicable concerns | Workforce-wide, executive tier as upsell | Built around NYC Litigation Partners presenting issues |
| Modality fit | Generalist talk therapy | Generalist therapy with some specialty | CBT, DBT, psychodynamic, matched at intake |
| Reach | National via roster density | National telehealth, roster variance | All 50 states via telehealth |
| Payment model | Firm-sponsored, in-network | Per-employee-per-month seat pricing | Private-pay, out-of-network, partnership agreement |
| Firm visibility | Aggregate, broker-mediated | Vendor dashboards with engagement | Administrative reporting only |
| Right fit for | Workforce-wide acute support | Mid-tier ongoing with executive add-on | NYC Litigation Partners, end-to-end |
What the firm sees, and what it does not.
For a partner-tier-tier channel to function, the participating partner has to trust that engaging with it does not create visibility into their care. CEREVITY is built around that requirement.
- Confirmation that contracted services were provided to eligible individuals.
- Aggregate utilization at the partnership level, where contractually appropriate.
- Invoicing and eligibility reconciliation.
- Nothing tied to a specific named partner's clinical content.
- Whether a specific named partner has scheduled, attended, or engaged.
- What clinical issues are being addressed, or which clinician is assigned.
- Session notes, treatment plans, or diagnostic information.
- Any attendance detail at the individual level.
Clinicians are independent licensed professionals operating under their own licensure and the confidentiality and privacy obligations that attach to it. Protected health information is held within the clinical infrastructure, and the agreements governing it are defined in writing before the partnership goes live.
Clinical records, session content, and individual engagement data sit inside the clinical platform. The administrative layer the partner interacts with is structurally separate from the clinical layer.
Eligibility lists are maintained on the partner side and confirmed at the point of intake. Administering eligibility does not require the partner to receive clinical information back.
A Business Associate Agreement is executed where the partnership structure requires it. The partnership agreement defines the administrative reporting scope in writing before the partnership goes live.
What the first 30 days look like.
The hardest part of a partner-tier-tier partnership is not the contract. It is the period between signature and the first partner in care.
A 60-minute kickoff with your team and CEREVITY's partnership lead. We confirm the partnership shape, the eligibility model, the administrative reporting scope, and the internal owner. The BAA, where applicable, is executed.
Your team provides the eligible-individual list. CEREVITY confirms it against the network and establishes the verification path at intake. Only eligibility confirmation flows forward.
CEREVITY provides a confidential, partner-tier-appropriate comms template explaining the benefit, the privacy posture, and how to access intake. Designed to be received without stigma.
Eligible individuals begin intake on their own cadence. First sessions are typically scheduled within 5 to 10 business days. By day 30, the partnership is operational and a quarterly review cadence is in place.
The business case for the NYC litigation firm.
Three axes the managing partner, executive committee, or well-being committee can defend in a partnership conversation. The numbers will vary by firm; the structural argument does not.
Senior partner retention is a per-departure problem.
A single senior litigation partner departure costs the firm millions in book transition, lateral search, and capacity rebuild on the trial bench. Industry analyses estimate that a failed lateral partner can cost a firm 200 to 400 percent of that lawyer's annual compensation once recruiter fees, guarantees, and replacement costs are factored in, per Lateral Link and related analyses. A concierge clinical channel pays for itself across very few prevented departures.
Partner performance is a leveraged input.
A senior litigation partner running at reduced capacity is not a 30% productivity loss. It is a leveraged loss across every matter that partner supervises, every associate they mentor, and every client relationship they hold. Recovery of clinical capacity flows downstream through the entire pyramid.
Lateral recruiting and chair attraction.
Senior litigation laterals and chair candidates increasingly evaluate firm well-being posture as part of the move decision. A named, confidential, concierge mental health channel at the partner tier is a differentiating signal in the New York lateral market and a defensible answer in an executive committee conversation.
Questions partners and their teams ask first.
The SLA governs intake response time, time-to-match, and time-to-first-session. Specific intervals are defined in writing in the partnership agreement and scoped to the realistic engagement window for senior litigation partners. The SLA is the operational backbone that makes the concierge channel function.
Our NYC clinical lead vets network members for prior experience with senior litigators and the partnership dynamics at top-tier firms. The vetting is qualitative and ongoing, and the network is kept small enough to maintain that standard.
No. Administrative reporting only. The firm receives confirmation that contracted services were provided to eligible individuals and aggregate utilization where contractually appropriate. The firm does not see whether a specific named partner has scheduled, attended, or engaged, what clinical issues are being addressed, or which clinician is assigned. This is contractually scoped before the partnership goes live.
Both. The NYC network includes clinicians who see partners in person in Manhattan and clinicians who work primarily by telehealth. The match is made on clinical fit and the partner's modality preference, not on geography alone.
No. CEREVITY is a structural complement to both. Most firms keep the EAP in place for workforce-wide coverage, refer partners with substance-use or impairment issues to the appropriate LAP, and add CEREVITY as the partner-tier private channel for ongoing depth-oriented work.
No. CEREVITY is private-pay and out-of-network by design. The structure is intentional: it is the only way to deliver the clinical scope, session formats, concierge intake, and confidentiality posture senior litigation partners require.
First sessions are typically scheduled within 5 to 10 business days of intake. The specific time-to-first-session interval for the concierge tier is governed by the contractual SLA defined in the partnership agreement.
Through a briefing call. Use the form below or email [email protected] directly. Briefings are scoped to your firm; we respond personally within 48 business hours.
Tell us about your firm. We respond within 48 business hours.
Briefings are scoped to your firm. Share a few details below and we will respond personally with proposed times, the concierge SLA structure, and any prepared materials relevant to the partner-tier channel you are evaluating.
The structural argument on this page is based on the firsthand experience of CEREVITY clinicians who have served on EAP panels, combined with widely-published industry estimates of EAP utilization and NYC Litigation Partners-specific data where cited. Specific contractual scopes are confirmed in writing in the partnership agreement before any partnership goes live.
