Clinical Whitepaper · Series No. 42
The Aviation Mental Health Disclosure Gap
More than half of pilots report avoiding care to protect their certificate. This report maps the certification system that drives the gap, what the FAA changed in 2026, and what an effective clinical response looks like.
23 min read · 5,223 words · 4 figures · 28 references
Executive summary
The most consequential finding in aviation mental health is not how many pilots are depressed. It is how many are hiding it. In a survey of 3,765 pilots, 56.1 percent reported avoiding healthcare because they feared losing their aeromedical certificate, and 26.8 percent had at least once misrepresented or withheld information on a health questionnaire.1 This is the pilot mental health disclosure gap: a population screened more rigorously than almost any other, routed by that very system toward concealment rather than care. The FAA has started to move, most recently with May 2026 guidance stating that counseling or therapy is encouraged when medically appropriate.6 Until the certification pathway is faster and better understood, the most direct lever is a care pathway pilots can trust: confidential, honest about what must be reported, and structurally separate from the employer and the insurance system.
A pilot's livelihood rests on a medical certificate renewed as often as every six months, and the pathway back from a disclosed condition can run for months.
Employer programs and insurance-billed care feel risky to pilots, and most do not know which therapy visits must be reported, when, or what the FAA actually sees.
Effective care for pilots is confidential from the employer and the insurer, honest with the FAA, and delivered by clinicians who document to the FAA's published standard.
When pilots understand that therapy is encouraged and reportable on a known schedule, they start care earlier and disclose it accurately, which protects both safety and the career.
The problemPilots are screened more rigorously than almost anyone, and the screening routes them toward silence§
The clearest single number comes from a 2022 study in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Surveying 3,765 pilots, the authors found that 56.1 percent reported a history of healthcare avoidance driven specifically by fear of losing their aeromedical certificate, 45.7 percent had sought informal medical care, and 26.8 percent had at least once misrepresented or withheld information on a written health questionnaire.1 The same research group has named this the pilot healthcare barrier.14 These are not the behaviors of a careless population. They are the behaviors of a careful one, responding rationally to a system in which the safest-looking answer to a medical question is often silence, which is why some pilots pay cash for therapy.
To understand why, start with what a medical certificate is. Exercising airline transport pilot privileges as pilot in command requires a first-class medical certificate, which lapses after 12 months for a pilot under 40 and after 6 months at 40 or older; commercial privileges require at least a second-class certificate, renewed every 12 months.17 Every renewal is a disclosure event. The FAA's Item 47 guidance for examiners and its Psychiatric Conditions Disposition Table list conditions, including depression requiring antidepressants, that an examiner cannot clear in the office and must send to the FAA for a decision.4, 5 An anonymous survey of airline pilots found that 233 of 1,848 respondents (12.6 percent) met the PHQ-9 threshold for depression and 75 (4.1 percent) reported thoughts of being better off dead or of self-harm in the prior two weeks.2 The same pattern is documented in medicine, where nearly 40 percent of physicians report reluctance to seek care over licensure concerns,27 and where confidential care for doctors worried about credentialing has become its own clinical niche.
Screening that punishes honesty does not keep unwell pilots out of the cockpit; it keeps unwell pilots out of treatment. CEREVITY clinical observation
The evidenceWhat the research shows§
The figures below come from peer-reviewed surveys of pilots in the United States and Canada, a national survey of collegiate pilots, and the FAA's own documents. The instruments, samples, and years differ, so the numbers are not directly comparable. What is consistent is the direction: wherever a certification consequence attaches to disclosure, measured care-seeking falls and measured concealment rises.
56.1%
of surveyed pilots avoided healthcare to protect their certificate
Hoffman et al., JOEM, 20221
12.6%
of airline pilots met the PHQ-9 depression threshold in an anonymous survey
Wu et al., Environ Health, 20162
26.8%
withheld or misrepresented information on a health questionnaire
Hoffman et al., JOEM, 20221
24
reform recommendations from the FAA's 2024 mental health rulemaking committee
FAA rulemaking committee, 20243
The pattern holds across every population studied with the same survey. US civilian pilots (56 percent) and Canadian pilots (55 percent) reported healthcare avoidance at nearly identical rates,25 72 percent of Canadian respondents said they had felt worried about seeking medical care because it may affect their career or hobby,11 and 72 percent of US military pilots reported avoidance, with 42.5 percent withholding information on aeromedical screening.26 Among collegiate pilots, 67.7 percent of respondents expressed concern about seeking care and 29.3 percent admitted withholding mental health information from aeromedical professionals, which suggests the behavior is learned early.10 The mental health burden itself is not exotic: in national data, 23.1 percent of US adults had a mental illness in 2022 and about half received treatment.12 The exceptional feature in aviation is the treatment and disclosure gap, the distance between how many are affected and how many feel able to seek formal, recorded care. A 2025 narrative review of studies published from 2010 to 2025 names fears related to job security and medical certification, and limited trust in confidentiality, among the primary barriers, and accessible, independent, confidential care among the key facilitators.13
01, 26, 10 Hoffman et al., JOEM 2022; Hoffman et al., Military Medicine 2023; Pitts and Faulconer, CARI 2024.
| Population | Prevalence or behavior | Care or disclosure | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Airline pilots, anonymous survey | 12.6% met PHQ-9 depression threshold | Anonymous by design, likely a floor | Wu et al., 2016 |
| US pilots, avoidance survey | 56.1% avoided healthcare | 45.7% sought informal care | Hoffman et al., 2022 |
| US pilots, health forms | 26.8% withheld or misrepresented information | Disclosure suppressed | Hoffman et al., 2022 |
| Airline pilots, past two weeks | 4.1% thoughts of being better off dead or of self-harm | Likely undercounted | Wu et al., 2016 |
| Collegiate pilots | 67.7% concerned about seeking care | 29.3% withheld mental health information | Pitts and Faulconer, 2024 |
| Canadian pilots | 72% worried about seeking care | 55% reported healthcare avoidance | Patel et al.; Hoffman et al., 2023 |
| US adults, national baseline | 23.1% any mental illness, 2022 | 50.6% received treatment | NIMH |
01, 25, 26, 11, 10 Hoffman et al., JOEM 2022 (US, n=3,765); Hoffman et al., Occupational Medicine 2023 (Canada comparison); Hoffman et al., Military Medicine 2023 (n=264); Patel et al., JOEM 2023 (Canada, n=1,405); Pitts and Faulconer, CARI 2024 (collegiate, about 256 respondents). Measures differ; read as directional.
The frameworkA model you can name and own§
Naming a pattern is the first step to treating it. The model below links three patterns we see in this work, the grounding fear, protective nondisclosure, and certificate-anchored identity, into a single cycle. Each phase is observable, and each is treatable once named. The model is a clinical-observation framework, not a validated instrument.
CEREVITY model
The Protective Nondisclosure Cycle
A four-phase description of how the certification system shapes a pilot's response to a mental health symptom. The more a career depends on the certificate, the longer a treatable condition can stay off the record, until an exam, an event, or a crisis forces it into view.
Grounding fear
The specific, recurring anticipation of being pulled from flying the moment a condition is named. It is not irrational: the FAA's own rulemaking committee identified fear as one of seven barriers to care.3
Protective nondisclosure
A rational decision to withhold a symptom or a course of treatment to protect the certificate. Its marker is informal care, sought by 45.7 percent of surveyed pilots.1
Certificate-anchored identity
Years of training, a professional identity, and household income hang on one document. The condition deepens untreated, and an omission on the next application becomes its own legal exposure.
Forced disclosure
A cardiac scare, an incident, a routine exam, or a crisis brings the full picture to clinical attention at once, at the point where it is hardest to treat and most likely to be deferred.
SCHEMATIC Schematic, not measured data.
Illustrative shape of the CEREVITY model described in this section. Index values are not measurements.
The point of naming the cycle is to move care earlier. Consider a hypothetical scenario: a first officer in her late thirties notices that her sleep has frayed and her mood has flattened over a difficult winter. She pays a therapist privately, never mentions it on a form, and tells herself she will deal with it properly once she has more seniority. What she does not weigh is that omitting a known visit from a federal medical application is itself a falsification, a more serious problem than the disclosure it avoids.
Consider a second hypothetical scenario: a captain with twenty years in the left seat has managed a low-grade depression privately for most of them. When a cardiac scare forces a medical review, the questionnaire frightens him more than his heart. The review he dreaded becomes the first time anyone with clinical training learns the whole picture. In both cases, early clinical care for anxiety and low mood in senior roles, disclosed accurately at the next application, would have been the safer path for the career as well as the person.
By professionHow it presents across roles§
The disclosure gap is not uniform across aviation. It widens and narrows with how exposed a given group feels to certification consequences, how often its members face a medical exam, and whether an employer or union program stands between the pilot and the FAA. The three groups below concentrate the risk. Clinical patterns described here are network-level observations, not diagnoses of any individual.
Airline pilots
Airline pilots carry the heaviest certification exposure. A captain exercising airline transport pilot privileges needs a first-class medical that must be renewed every 12 months under age 40 and every 6 months from 40, so the disclosure question returns as often as twice a year.17 The anonymous airline survey found 12.6 percent meeting the PHQ-9 depression threshold, almost certainly an undercount given the incentive to stay quiet.2 Treatment is compatible with flying: the FAA reports that 522 pilots were flying while taking SSRI antidepressants in 2023.3 Under current policy, a pilot on an approved antidepressant must be clinically stable on a stable dose for at least 3 continuous months and be evaluated by a HIMS-trained aviation medical examiner.15 What we observe across the network is that airline pilots rarely doubt that therapy helps; they doubt that it is survivable for a career built on seniority, where months on the ground cost both income and position. The clinically useful response is to separate the two questions. Therapy itself is reported at the next application and, in the FAA's words, is compatible with an unrestricted medical certificate.7 The certification question arises only if a diagnosis or medication brings the case to the FAA, and that pathway is known in advance. Pilots who see that sequence clearly tend to start care earlier and disclose it accurately.
Individual therapist for pilots
Organizational a pilot mental health program for regional and charter airlines
Business, charter and general aviation pilots
Pilots flying for charter operators, corporate flight departments, and fractional programs exercise commercial privileges on a second-class medical renewed every 12 months, and many pilots in general aviation fly on a third-class certificate or under BasicMed.17 BasicMed, expanded by Congress in 2024, now covers aircraft with up to 7 occupants and a maximum takeoff weight of 12,500 pounds, carrying no more than 6 passengers, below 18,000 feet and 250 knots.18, 20 It requires a medical education course every 24 months and a physician exam every 48 months, but it is not a way around mental health review: a history of psychosis, bipolar disorder, a severe personality disorder, or substance dependence within 2 years requires completing the FAA special issuance process first.17, 19 What distinguishes this group is isolation. The FAA notes that the HIMS program is not used by all airlines, and a two-pilot corporate department may have no peer support program at all, even though the rulemaking committee reports that more than 80 percent of calls to established pilot peer support lines are resolved at peer level.23, 3 In our network, business and charter pilots most often describe the same fear as airline crews with less structure around it: no union representative, no HIMS sponsor, and a chief pilot who is also a direct manager. Confidential care outside the employer, matched to a clinician who understands the reporting rules, fills that gap.
Individual therapy for corporate jet pilots, kept private
Organizational confidential care for business aviation flight crews
Pilots on special issuance or in HIMS
Some pilots are already inside the system: flying on an Authorization for Special Issuance, returning through the antidepressant pathway, or monitored through HIMS, the industry program the FAA describes as coordinating the identification, assessment, treatment, and medical certification of pilots, originally for alcohol and drug dependence.9 The numbers are larger than many pilots assume. The FAA reported 2,996 pilots flying in 2023 with a history of substance dependence, with roughly 85 percent relapse free, and its 2024 public guidance states that only about 0.1 to 0.2 percent of applicants who disclose a health issue and complete the process ultimately receive a final denial.3, 22 For this group the disclosure question is settled; the clinical question is continuity. FAA guidance asks treating psychotherapists to use DSM-5-TR terminology, document the specific criteria met with comments on severity, insight, resilience, and the ability to self-monitor, avoid both upcoding and minimization, and keep process notes separate from progress notes.8 Therapists who are not willing or able to meet those requirements, the FAA says, should consider carefully whether to accept such a client.8 What we observe is that pilots on a monitored pathway often limit what they say in mandated sessions and carry the rest alone. A separate, confidential therapeutic relationship, disclosed as required, gives them room to do the actual work while the certification file stays accurate.
Individual FAA-mandated therapy and HIMS AME reporting
Organizational a confidential EAP alternative for employers
The stakesThe cost of inaction§
For a pilot, the cost of the disclosure gap is measured in three currencies: time on the ground, legal exposure, and the safety consequences of an untreated condition. Each has been measured.
Career: time on the ground
Most certificates are issued in the examiner's office, but a deferred case waits. The DOT Inspector General found the FAA took an average of about 138 days, and up to 459 days, to decide applications examiners had deferred.21 The FAA rulemaking committee documented a timeline of more than 500 days for an initial antidepressant authorization, with psychiatric review alone taking 150 to 180 days against a 30-day goal.3
Legal: the price of silence
Silence is not free either. The FAA's guide for examiners warns that a false or fraudulent statement on the medical application may be fined up to 250,000 dollars or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.23 Knowingly omitting a material fact is also grounds for certificate action under the FAA's falsification rule.24
Safety: the record and the reality
In an FAA study of pilots killed in accidents whose postmortem toxicology showed SSRI antidepressants, 52 of the 59 with medical records (88 percent) had never self-reported the condition or the medication.28 Untreated and undisclosed conditions do not leave the cockpit; they leave the record. The safety argument, taken seriously, is an argument for making disclosure safe.
21, 03 US DOT Office of Inspector General, AV2023038, 2023; FAA Mental Health and Aviation Medical Clearances ARC report, 2024.
The solutionWhat effective care looks like§
Effective care for pilots has to solve for the fear of disclosure without asking anyone to hide anything. The FAA's May 2026 guidance makes that possible. It states: "Maintaining mental health is crucial for ensuring both safety and operational performance. Counseling or therapy is encouraged when medically appropriate."6 Its companion FAQ is explicit: visits to licensed psychotherapists and counselors are reported on the MedXPress application, pilots are not obliged to report until their next application, and educational counseling, religious counseling, couples counseling without a referral for individual therapy, and EAP consultations without a referral for psychiatric evaluation or treatment need not be reported. Speaking with a therapist does not automatically create a diagnosis, and the FAA usually does not see therapy records; if documentation is requested, it is usually a brief summary from the therapist.7 CEREVITY has written about what pilots can and cannot do without reporting.
Good care, then, is confidential from the employer and the insurer, honest with the FAA, and delivered by a clinician who knows the documentation standard. CEREVITY is built around those requirements, and the way CEREVITY structures care follows from them. It is a nationwide network of independent licensed clinicians, matched to the person, delivered by secure video, on a private-pay basis that keeps the work out of the insurance system and away from any employer record. CEREVITY does not conduct aeromedical evaluations, fitness-for-duty assessments, or FAA medical certification testing, and it does not change what a pilot must report.
Sessions run in three formats: 50-minute, 90-minute, and 3-hour intensive. Standard-depth sessions fit a pilot with a predictable schedule, while 90-minute extended work suits a pilot whose trips allow fewer, longer appointments.
For a pilot with a long layover block or a short window between trips, the intensive format allows concentrated work without forcing care into a weekly slot a roster cannot hold.
ImplementationHow to put it into practice§
For an individual pilot, the path to confidential, compliant care is short. For operators and unions, the rulemaking committee's recommendations set out the structural work. The roadmap below combines both.
- 01
Know what is reportable, and when
Read the FAA's therapy FAQ before the first session. Therapy visits are reported on MedXPress at your next application, not before, and several counseling types are excluded entirely.7 Knowing the rule removes most of the grounding fear.
- 02
Start early, with a clinician who knows the standard
Choose a licensed clinician willing to document to the FAA's psychotherapist guidance, so that any summary later requested is accurate and usable.8 Early care is the clinical and the certification advantage.
- 03
Disclose accurately at the next application
Report the visits, bring documentation if asked, and let the examiner apply the published tools. Examiners may now issue in the office for up to two listed anxiety or depression conditions treated with psychotherapy or a single medication last taken two or more years ago.16 Omission carries far greater risk than disclosure.23
- 04
For operators and unions: build the structure
Fund peer support, shorten internal referral paths, and support the rulemaking committee's 24 recommendations. Congress directed the FAA in 2024 to form an aviation workforce mental health task group to monitor their implementation.3, 20
RecommendationsWhere to start§
Clinical
Treat at the first signal
Disrupted sleep and flattened mood are the moment to start, not a crisis. Clinical care for pressure that never lets up is most effective, and simplest to document, before a condition deepens.
Clinical
Document to the FAA standard
Treating clinicians should use DSM-5-TR terminology, record criteria with severity and insight, avoid both upcoding and minimization, and keep process notes separate.8 That protects the patient and the certificate together.
Structural
Shorten the pathway
The rulemaking committee recommends cutting the minimum special issuance wait from six months to two and reducing psychiatric review times that run 150 to 180 days.3 Faster decisions remove the strongest incentive to stay silent.
Structural
Make confidential support universal
Where established peer support exists, more than 80 percent of calls are resolved at peer level.3 Smaller operators may have no equivalent. Every pilot, at every operator size, should have confidential access to care outside the employer.
FAQCommon questions§
If I start therapy, will the FAA find out?
Does seeing a therapist create a diagnosis or ground me?
Is it safer for my career to just stay quiet?
How does private-pay billing work?
How is my privacy protected?
MethodologyHow this paper was built§
Methodology
This whitepaper synthesizes peer-reviewed studies and primary government documents on pilot mental health and FAA medical certification. Sources were identified through structured searches of PubMed and PubMed Central, journal portals (Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Environmental Health, Occupational Medicine, Military Medicine, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance), the eCFR, the Federal Register, govinfo, and the FAA's published guidance, covering 2007 to September 2026. The original searches were run in June 2026 and every source was re-opened and re-checked in October 2026. The principal avoidance figures come from Hoffman and colleagues (2022), a survey of 3,765 US pilots; the US and Canadian comparison from a 2023 analysis adding 1,405 Canadian pilots; and the military figures from a sub-analysis of 264 US military pilots. These studies measure avoidance of healthcare in general, not mental health care specifically. The prevalence figures come from Wu and colleagues (2016), an anonymous survey in which 1,848 airline pilots completed the PHQ-9. The collegiate figures come from a survey of roughly 256 respondents drawn from a population of 2,452. System mechanics come from the FAA rulemaking committee report (April 2024) and its appended FAA data, the DOT Inspector General's 2023 review of 69 deferred applications, the FAA's May and June 2026 therapy documents, the current Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners, and the regulations at 14 CFR parts 3, 61, and 68. Regulatory statements reflect the documents as published on the dates shown in the references and can change. Several limitations apply. The pilot surveys rely on self-report and non-probability sampling, and their response is itself shaped by the avoidance they measure, so reported rates are best read as conservative. The studies differ in instrument, sample, and year and are not directly comparable; the table and figures are directional. FAA counts are reported as the agency published them. This report contains no CEREVITY internal intake data. The Protective Nondisclosure Cycle and its figure are a clinical-observation framework, not a validated instrument, and the vignettes are hypothetical. This report was prepared and clinically reviewed by Martha Fernandez, LCSW. CEREVITY is not an FAA-designated aviation medical examiner or an aviation medical or legal advisor, and it makes no certification determinations. This whitepaper is for educational purposes and is not medical or legal advice.
References
- 01Hoffman, W. R., Aden, J., Barbera, R. D., et al. (2022). Healthcare Avoidance in Aircraft Pilots Due to Concern for Aeromedical Certificate Loss: A Survey of 3765 Pilots. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64(4), e245-e248. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 02Wu, A. C., Donnelly-McLay, D., Weisskopf, M. G., McNeely, E., Betancourt, T. S., & Allen, J. G. (2016). Airplane pilot mental health and suicidal thoughts: a cross-sectional descriptive study via anonymous web-based survey. Environmental Health, 15, 121. link.springer.com
- 03Federal Aviation Administration. (2024). Mental Health and Aviation Medical Clearances Aviation Rulemaking Committee: Recommendations Report (April 1, 2024). faa.gov
- 04Federal Aviation Administration. Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners, Item 47: Psychiatric Conditions (last updated July 29, 2026). faa.gov
- 05Federal Aviation Administration. Psychiatric Conditions Disposition Table (last updated May 29, 2024). faa.gov
- 06Federal Aviation Administration. (2026). Therapy, Psychotherapy and Counseling: Information for Pilots and ATCS (updated May 27, 2026). faa.gov
- 07Federal Aviation Administration. (2026). Therapy, Psychotherapy and Counseling FAQs for Pilots and ATCS (updated May 27, 2026). faa.gov
- 08Federal Aviation Administration. (2026). Information for Psychotherapists Treating Pilots and ATCS (updated June 24, 2026). faa.gov
- 09Federal Register. (2010). Special Issuance of Airman Medical Certificates to Applicants Being Treated With Certain Antidepressant Medications, 75 FR 17047. federalregister.gov
- 10Pitts, L., & Faulconer, E. (2024). Flying Under the Radar: A Survey of Collegiate Pilots' Mental Health. Collegiate Aviation Review International, 41(1). ojs.library.okstate.edu
- 11Patel, P. K., Hoffman, W. R., Aden, J., & Acker, J. P. (2023). Health Care Avoidance Among Canadian Pilots Due to Fear of Medical Certificate Loss: A National Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65(6), e413-e417. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 12National Institute of Mental Health. Mental Illness statistics (2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data). nimh.nih.gov
- 13Minoretti, P. (2025). Barriers and Facilitators to Mental Health Support Among Airline Pilots: A Narrative Review. Cureus, 17(8), e91340. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 14Hoffman, W. R., Bjerke, E., & Tvaryanas, A. (2022). Breaking the pilot healthcare barrier. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 93(8), 649-650. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 15Federal Aviation Administration. Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners: Use of Antidepressant Medications (last updated December 3, 2025). faa.gov
- 16Federal Aviation Administration. (2024). Anxiety, Depression, and Related Conditions Disposition Table (updated June 26, 2024). faa.gov
- 17Code of Federal Regulations. 14 CFR 61.23, Medical certificates: Requirement and duration. ecfr.gov
- 18Federal Aviation Administration. BasicMed (last updated June 3, 2026). faa.gov
- 19Code of Federal Regulations. 14 CFR 68.9, Special Issuance process. ecfr.gov
- 20FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024, Public Law 118-63, sections 411 and 828. govinfo.gov
- 21US Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector General. (2023). FAA Pilot Mental Health, report AV2023038 (July 12, 2023). oig.dot.gov
- 22Federal Aviation Administration. (2024). Fact Checking Medical Myths in Aviation. faa.gov
- 23Federal Aviation Administration. Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners, full guide (version September 30, 2026). faa.gov
- 24Code of Federal Regulations. 14 CFR 3.403, False statements and omissions (effective November 3, 2025). ecfr.gov
- 25Hoffman, W. R., Patel, P. K., Aden, J., et al. (2023). Multinational comparison study of aircraft pilot healthcare avoidance behaviour. Occupational Medicine, 73(7), 434-438. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 26Hoffman, W. R., Aden, J. K., Barbera, D., & Tvaryanas, A. (2023). Self-Reported Health Care Avoidance Behavior in U.S. Military Pilots Related to Fear for Loss of Flying Status. Military Medicine, 188(3-4), e446-e450. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 27Dyrbye, L. N., et al. (2017). Medical Licensure Questions and Physician Reluctance to Seek Care for Mental Health Conditions. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92(10), 1486-1493. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 28Sen, A., Akin, A., Canfield, D. V., & Chaturvedi, A. K. (2007). Medical histories of 61 aviation accident pilots with postmortem SSRI antidepressant residues. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78(11), 1055-1059. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Licensed Clinical Social Worker
Martha Fernandez, LCSW is Co-Founder of CEREVITY and a Licensed Clinical Social Worker licensed in California, seeing clients by telehealth nationwide through CEREVITY's network of independent licensed clinicians. USC-trained and bilingual in English and Spanish, she works with founders, executives, attorneys and pilots on burnout, anxiety and depression in high performers, on trauma, grief and high-stakes transitions, and on couples and relationship strain under pressure. Her clinical work draws on cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, behavioral activation, and narrative and solution-focused approaches. She is the author of Wired to Burn.
Talk to someone who gets it.
If this paper describes something you recognize, a confidential conversation is the next step. CEREVITY matches you to an independent licensed clinician who works with people in your position.
Schedule consultationPrivate-pay, telehealth, nationwide. Questions: (562) 295-6650
