Therapist Insights / Therapy Types
Emotional processing therapy is a family of approaches not one protocol.
Search the phrase and most of the results describe one branded treatment with a founder and a manual. That is not what it is. Emotional processing is a mechanism, studied in clinical psychology for decades, and several distinct therapies are built to produce it. Knowing which one you are actually being offered changes what the work will ask of you and how long it takes.
THE QUICK TAKEAWAY
Emotional processing therapy is not a single branded protocol with its own trial base. The phrase names a family of approaches organized around one shared mechanism: bringing a feeling fully into awareness, staying in contact with it long enough for the state to shift, and letting the meaning attached to it update. Emotion-focused and experiential therapies target that mechanism directly, and exposure-based treatment targets it for fear. High achievers often arrive with alexithymia in its milder form, able to narrate a brutal year in precise detail and unable to say what any of it felt like.
§01 / 09 / Definition
What the phrase actually refers to.
Emotional processing therapy names a family of approaches rather than one manualized treatment. Emotion-focused therapy, experiential and process-experiential methods, and exposure-based treatment all aim at the same mechanism from different angles. CEREVITY clinicians name the specific approach being used rather than the category.
Almost every page that ranks for this phrase makes the same quiet assumption: that emotional processing therapy is one thing, with a founder, a manual and a body of randomized trials behind it, in the way that EMDR or Cognitive Processing Therapy is one thing. That assumption is wrong, and correcting it is the most useful thing an article on this subject can do. Emotional processing is a mechanism. The phrase names the group of therapies built to produce it. Rachman's emotional processing theory described how a disturbing emotional experience gets absorbed until it stops interrupting everything around it. Foa and Kozak's emotional processing theory of fear took the same idea and made it specific enough to build exposure treatment on, which is why the term appears constantly in the trauma literature. Greenberg's emotion-focused therapy took it in a different direction entirely, treating emotion as the primary source of meaning rather than as a symptom to be reduced. A small number of clinicians have also used the exact phrase as the name of a specific program, which is part of why the search results appear to contradict each other. None of that is a reason to dismiss the category. It is a reason to ask which approach is actually being proposed. At CEREVITY that question gets settled during matching, which is what happens between your inquiry and the first session.
Five things the phrase is actually pointing at
A mechanism, not a brand
Every approach in this family is trying to move the same thing: an emotional response that has been held out of awareness, or held at a distance, and has stopped changing on its own. The brand names differ. The target does not.
The feeling itself, not the story about it
Most professionals arrive fluent in the narrative. They can date the decline, list the contributing factors and explain the tradeoffs they made. What they cannot do is locate the feeling that sits underneath the account, and that gap is precisely what the work goes after.
A tolerance problem rather than a knowledge problem
Insight is rarely the missing ingredient. Someone can understand exactly why they went numb after the reorganization and still find that the numbness has not moved an inch. Understanding and processing are different operations, and only one of them changes the state.
A vocabulary problem in a specific clinical sense
Alexithymia describes difficulty identifying and describing feeling states, and difficulty separating emotion from the bodily sensation that accompanies it. Measured on a dimension rather than diagnosed, it is common enough that a clinician should be checking for it rather than assuming a client can simply report what they feel.
A pacing problem that gets underestimated
Contact with a feeling that has been held down for years does not fit neatly into the last ten minutes of an appointment. Pacing is a clinical decision in this work, not an administrative one, and it is the reason session depth comes up early rather than late.
▶ Research
The clearest research boundary in this area is between suppression and reappraisal, two strategies that look interchangeable from the outside and are not. A 2025 study in Frontiers in Psychiatry, surveying 391 adults on the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, reported that cognitive reappraisal tracked with better outcomes across the board, correlating negatively with anxiety and depression and positively with wellbeing, while expressive suppression ran the other way, correlating positively with depression and anxiety and negatively with wellbeing. The authors state directly that reappraisal acted as the more adaptive strategy and suppression as the less adaptive one. For a high achiever who has spent fifteen years treating composure as a professional skill, that distinction is not academic. Holding a face still and changing what an event means are two different operations with two different bills.1
What the research actually separates
Suppression and reappraisal are not two versions of the same skill
Both look like self-control from the outside, and both are things professionals are rewarded for. The Frontiers in Psychiatry data separate them cleanly: one of them is associated with better mental health, the other with worse. Someone who believes they are excellent at managing emotion is often excellent at suppression specifically, which is the version with the cost attached.
Emotion-regulation skill is a measurable mechanism, not a metaphor
A 2019 randomized controlled trial published in PLOS ONE assigned 218 adults with major depressive disorder to a group emotion-regulation training, a waitlist control or a common-factors control. The training outperformed the waitlist with a moderate effect, and the authors reported that changes in emotion regulation skills mediated the difference. The mechanism moved, and the symptoms followed.
Alexithymia is a dimension, not a diagnosis
Alexithymia does not appear in the DSM-5-TR as a disorder. It is measured on a scale, most often the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, and a 2008 study of 1,859 adults in the German general population found that ten percent scored above the standard cutoff. That figure is a reasonable answer to the question people ask most often about it, which is whether difficulty naming feelings is rare. It is not.
Three ideas the whole approach rests on
Whatever brand name sits on the door, the approaches in this family share three commitments. Every method described later in this article accepts all three, and most of the confusion between them comes down to which one a given approach emphasizes first. Reading them separately makes the differences between the named therapies far easier to see.
Emotion carries information
A feeling is treated as data about what matters, not as noise to be dampened. Anger points at a boundary. Grief points at a loss that was never marked. Under this view, a professional who has trained themselves out of feeling has also trained themselves out of a signal they were using to steer.
Avoidance is maintained by relief
Stepping away from an unwanted feeling works, briefly, and the relief is what teaches the pattern to repeat. The VA National Center for PTSD makes this point plainly about trauma, noting that avoiding the feelings and situations keeps a person from recovering. The same logic scales down to milder patterns of emotional shutdown.
Change happens in contact, not in description
Talking about an emotion at a safe analytic distance does not reliably change it. The approaches in this family arrange for the feeling to be present in the room, at an intensity the person can stay with, because that is the condition under which the associated belief has a chance to update.
§02 / 09 / Telehealth
What processing a feeling involves.
Emotional processing involves three steps rather than one: bringing a feeling fully into awareness, staying in contact with it long enough for the physiological state to shift, and letting the belief attached to it update. Emotional suppression short-circuits the first step, which is why senior professionals often cannot find the feeling at all.
Awareness has to come before regulation
Regulation skills fail quietly when the person cannot identify what they are regulating. This is the practical consequence of alexithymia and it is the reason a competent clinician spends early sessions on naming rather than on technique. The vocabulary being built is not literary. It is closer to a list: tight chest, jaw, a pull toward the laptop at eleven at night, and eventually the word that belongs underneath all three.
Contact has to outlast the urge to stop it
The moment a held feeling becomes available, the reflex that has been managing it for years arrives on schedule. Checking a phone, changing the subject, moving to analysis, making a joke about how ridiculous this is. Every one of those ends contact and restores the relief that maintains the pattern. Staying with the state past that point is the part that requires a clinician, and it is not something to attempt alone.
The meaning has to update, not just the intensity
Bringing arousal down is not the same as processing. A feeling has finished processing when the conclusion attached to it has changed: not simply that the grief is quieter, but that the belief it carried about what the loss said about you no longer holds in the same way. Approaches in this family measure progress against that second change, which is slower and more durable than symptom relief alone.
§03 / 09 / Mechanism
Why suppression costs more than it looks.
Chronic emotional suppression usually presents as exhaustion rather than as sadness, which is why senior professionals tend to reach a clinician through fatigue, irritability or a body that has stopped cooperating. Alexithymia makes the pattern harder to catch, because the person describing it cannot name what they have been holding.
The presentation that brings people to this topic is almost never described as an emotional problem. It is described as tiredness that sleep does not touch, a shortening fuse at home paired with total composure at work, a loss of interest in things that used to be reliable, or a run of physical complaints with no clean explanation. Nobody arrives saying they have stopped processing emotion. They arrive saying they are exhausted and cannot work out why, given that the job is going well and nothing catastrophic has happened. The link between the two is not mysterious. Holding a response down is an active operation, repeated daily, that consumes resources and produces no completion. A feeling that is processed finishes. A feeling that is suppressed stays live and keeps drawing on the same account, and after enough years the withdrawal shows up as fatigue rather than as feeling, because fatigue is the only thing the system is still willing to report.
Alexithymia is the second half of the explanation, and it is the part that gets missed. The construct describes difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing them to another person, and a thinking style oriented toward external detail rather than internal state. It is measured rather than diagnosed, most often with the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, and it does not appear in the DSM-5-TR as a disorder in its own right. A 2008 study in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology assessed 1,859 adults from the German general population and found that ten percent exceeded the standard cutoff score. High-performing environments do not cause the trait, but they reward the surface of it relentlessly: the person who reports facts rather than reactions is easier to work with, more promotable and, for a long stretch, more effective. The bill arrives later, and it arrives without a label attached.
There is a third layer that professionals rarely mention until it is asked about directly. A person who has spent a decade being competent in public and vacant in private usually has a private theory that the vacancy is the real one. That theory is closely related to the gap between an impressive resume and how you actually feel at work, and it is worth naming early, because it changes what the work is aiming at. The pattern is also rarely contained to one person. Partners generally notice the shutdown long before the person does, and describe it as being managed rather than met, which is one version of why high-performing partners often communicate better at work than they do at home. Where the pattern has settled into the household rather than the individual, work that includes the household is sometimes the more direct route.
► Standard advice vs. CEREVITY's approach
Standard therapy
"Treat composure at all times as the goal of therapy"
CEREVITY
"Treat composure as one setting among several, and notice what it costs to hold"
Standard therapy
"Assume you already know what you feel and just need a strategy"
CEREVITY
"Check whether the feeling can be named at all before choosing a technique"
Standard therapy
"Try to open a held feeling on your own, at speed, to save time"
CEREVITY
"Do that work with a clinician, at a pace that leaves the day usable afterwards"
| Standard insurance-based therapy | CEREVITY's specialized approach |
|---|---|
| "Treat composure at all times as the goal of therapy" | "Treat composure as one setting among several, and notice what it costs to hold" |
| "Assume you already know what you feel and just need a strategy" | "Check whether the feeling can be named at all before choosing a technique" |
| "Try to open a held feeling on your own, at speed, to save time" | "Do that work with a clinician, at a pace that leaves the day usable afterwards" |
A break from the page
Naming it is the first clinical step.
A first message is confidential and commits you to nothing. CEREVITY is a nationwide network of independent licensed clinicians working private-pay, with no insurance claim submitted and no diagnosis on a payer record. If the description above lands and you would rather not spend another year testing it, start with a private inquiry.
§04 / 09 / Cases
Common challenges we address.
The executive who can narrate the year and not name one feeling
The patternSomeone who gives a clear, ordered, chronological account of an extremely difficult eighteen months, complete with the decisions they would make differently, and answers the question about how it felt with another fact. The account is accurate. There is simply nothing in it about the person telling it.
What we addressThe early work is vocabulary, built from body state upward rather than from insight downward, because insight is the one thing this person already has in surplus. Where the exhaustion underneath it has stopped responding to time away from the desk, the presentation is closer to clinical work on executive burnout than to anything requiring a new framework.
The person convinced that feeling it will make it worse
The patternA senior professional who has concluded, on reasonable evidence, that opening any of this would be destabilizing at a moment when several people depend on them being steady. The fear is not irrational. It is a prediction based on one unstructured experience of the feeling arriving uninvited.
What we addressStructure is the answer to that fear rather than reassurance. Contact with a difficult emotion in this work is titrated, planned and ended deliberately, and the difference between that and being ambushed by it at two in the morning is the entire point of doing it with a clinician instead of alone.
§05 / 09 / Methods
Evidence-based treatment approaches.
Five named approaches account for most of what clinicians mean by emotional processing therapy: emotion-focused therapy, experiential and process-experiential methods, exposure treatment where the emotion is fear, emotion-regulation skills training, and emotionally focused work with couples and families. High achievers are matched to one of them after assessment.
Emotion-focused therapy
Developed by Leslie Greenberg and the closest thing this family has to a flagship. Emotion is treated as foundational to how a person organizes their sense of self, and the clinician works as an emotion coach across four goals: emotion awareness, emotion regulation, emotion transformation, and reflection on emotion. The model distinguishes primary from secondary emotion, and adaptive from maladaptive emotion, which is what allows a clinician to tell the difference between anger that is protecting grief and anger that is the actual response.
Experiential and process-experiential methods
The set of techniques that create contact rather than describe it: focusing attention on a felt sense before it has a name, chair work that puts an internal conflict into two positions instead of one argument, and structured attention to bodily state as the entry point. These are often used inside emotion-focused therapy rather than offered separately, and they are the parts that feel least like a conversation and most like an exercise.
Exposure-based treatment, where the emotion is fear
Prolonged Exposure and its relatives rest directly on emotional processing theory of fear. The VA National Center for PTSD describes the logic without hedging: avoidance of feelings and situations provides relief and keeps a person from recovering, so treatment involves working through an agreed list of avoided situations step by step, typically across eight to fifteen weekly sessions. This is the best-evidenced corner of the family and also the one that must never be attempted without a trained clinician.
Emotion-regulation skills training
Structured training in identifying, tolerating and modifying emotional states, usually delivered in a defined number of sessions with practice between them. A 2019 randomized controlled trial in PLOS ONE tested one such program in 218 adults with major depressive disorder and found it reduced depressive symptoms more than a waitlist control, with change in emotion regulation skills carrying the effect. For someone who cannot yet stay with a feeling at all, this is often where the work starts rather than ends.
Emotionally focused work with couples and families
The same mechanism applied where the feeling is stuck between people rather than inside one. Sessions are used to slow an interaction down until the emotion driving it is visible to both parties, which is a different task from teaching communication technique. This format is frequently the more efficient route when the presenting complaint is distance at home alongside high functioning everywhere else.
§06 / 09 / Investment
Understanding the investment in private-pay care.
Private-pay, nationwide, and paced to the work
At CEREVITY, our online individual therapy sessions are structured as a direct investment in your mental agility and overall well-being. The investment includes:
- Licensed mental health professional specializing in emotion-focused work for high performers
- Evidence-based, one-on-one approaches proven effective for emotional numbness, exhaustion, and low mood
- Flexible online scheduling including evenings and weekends
- Complete privacy with no insurance involvement or red tape
- High achievers and senior professionals expertise and understanding
- Outcome tracking and progress measurement
The cost of emotional processing therapy going unaddressed
Consider what is at stake when emotional processing therapy goes unaddressed:
What private-pay changes about this particular work
Working outside of insurance means no diagnosis on a claim record, no payer reviewing whether the work should continue, and no benefit design quietly capping the number of sessions at the point where a held feeling has just become available. For emotional processing specifically that last point matters more than usual, because the phase where contact is possible and the meaning has not yet updated is exactly the phase a utilization review tends to end. View our current rates here: cerevity.com/our-pricing-for-therapy/. For reimbursement questions and the mechanics of paying for care, see how payment works.
Session formats and pacing that fit the approach
Care is delivered by secure telehealth nationwide across all 50 states. Vocabulary building and skills work sit comfortably in standard 50-minute sessions, while sustained contact with a held emotion usually needs more room in one sitting, which is why extended 90-minute sessions and 3-hour intensives exist. Most of this work is delivered in one-to-one sessions, and professionals whose calendars will not hold a fixed weekly slot often do better with priority access to a clinician than with a schedule they will keep cancelling. Practical points of the kind that come up before anyone books are collected in the questions everyone asks before they call.
§07 / 09 / Evidence
What the research shows.
The honest summary of the evidence is that the mechanism is well supported and the label is not. Emotional processing theory underpins exposure treatment for post-traumatic stress, which is among the most tested psychotherapies that exist; the VA National Center for PTSD states plainly that Prolonged Exposure is one of the most effective treatments available for that condition. StatPearls, in its 2024 review of trauma-informed therapy, defines trauma-focused psychotherapy as any therapy using cognitive, emotional or behavioral techniques to facilitate the processing of a traumatic experience, which places processing at the centre of the definition rather than at the edge of it. Emotion-regulation skills training has direct randomized evidence, including a 2019 PLOS ONE trial in 218 adults with major depressive disorder where the improvement in skills mediated the reduction in symptoms.
► What the studies behind this work report
adults with major depressive disorder randomized in a trial of group emotion-regulation training, which beat a waitlist control.
PLOS ONE, 2019
of a 1,859-person general-population sample scored above the standard alexithymia cutoff on the Toronto Alexithymia Scale.
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2008
adults surveyed on emotion regulation, where reappraisal tracked with wellbeing and suppression tracked with anxiety and depression.
Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2025
What does not exist is a single treatment called emotional processing therapy with its own guideline recommendation and its own pooled effect size. Anyone presenting the phrase that way is describing something the literature does not contain. The surrounding evidence is nonetheless real and points in a consistent direction: expressive suppression is associated with worse anxiety, depression and wellbeing outcomes than cognitive reappraisal, per a 2025 Frontiers in Psychiatry study of 391 adults; difficulty naming feeling states is common rather than exotic, with ten percent of a 1,859-person general-population sample scoring above the alexithymia cutoff in a 2008 study; and interventions that move emotion regulation move symptoms with it. The right question to ask a prospective clinician is therefore not whether they do emotional processing therapy, but which of the named approaches they are trained in and how they would sequence it for someone who cannot yet name what they feel.
§§ / 09 / Recap
Key takeaways.
Five things to remember
- Ask for the specific approach, not the category Emotional processing therapy is a family, not a product. A clinician who can say which named approach they use, and why it suits this presentation, is telling you something a category label cannot.
- Naming comes before technique Where alexithymia is present, regulation strategies land on nothing. Time spent building a working vocabulary for internal states is not a delay before the real work. It is the precondition for it.
- Composure and reappraisal are not the same skill Holding a face still is suppression, and the research associates it with worse outcomes than changing what an event means. Professionals rewarded for the first one often assume they are already doing the second.
- Pacing is clinical, and it is not solo work Contact with a held emotion is planned, titrated and closed deliberately. Attempting exposure or deep emotional work alone is how people confirm their worst prediction about it and stop for another five years.
- CEREVITY provides this through online individual therapy nationwide, with full privacy through its private-pay concierge network and no insurance involvement.
§08 / 09 / FAQ
Frequently asked questions.
What is emotional processing therapy?
Emotional processing therapy refers to a family of psychotherapies organized around one mechanism rather than to a single manualized protocol. That mechanism has three parts: bringing an emotion fully into awareness, staying in contact with it long enough for the state to shift, and allowing the belief attached to it to update. Emotion-focused therapy and experiential methods target it directly, exposure-based treatments target it where the emotion is fear, and emotion-regulation skills training builds the capacity to do it at all. CEREVITY clinicians name which of these they are using rather than offering the category, because the approaches differ substantially in structure, length and what they ask of the person in the room.
What techniques does emotional processing therapy use?
Techniques in this family are designed to create contact with an emotion rather than discussion about it. Common ones include attention to a felt bodily sense before it has a name, chair work that separates an internal conflict into two distinct positions, structured emotion labelling for people with alexithymia, graded exposure to avoided situations where fear is the target emotion, and between-session practice in identifying and tolerating states as they arise. Emotion-focused therapy organizes these around four goals: emotion awareness, emotion regulation, emotion transformation, and reflection on emotion. The selection depends on assessment, and none of the deeper contact work is intended to be attempted alone.
Is emotional processing therapy used for PTSD?
Emotional processing theory is the foundation of exposure treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder, so the answer is yes, though the treatment is usually named Prolonged Exposure rather than emotional processing therapy. The VA National Center for PTSD describes the mechanism directly: avoiding trauma reminders provides temporary relief and prevents recovery, so treatment involves working through an agreed list of avoided people, places and activities step by step, typically over eight to fifteen weekly sessions. CEREVITY matches anyone presenting with post-traumatic stress to a clinician trained in a guideline-recommended trauma treatment rather than to a general emotion-focused approach.
What is the difference between emotional suppression and emotion regulation?
Emotional suppression is one strategy within the broader category of emotion regulation, and the research does not treat it as equivalent to the others. A 2025 study in Frontiers in Psychiatry surveying 391 adults found that cognitive reappraisal, meaning a change in how an event is interpreted, correlated with lower anxiety and depression and higher wellbeing, while expressive suppression, meaning holding the outward display still, correlated in the opposite direction on all of those measures. High achievers frequently believe they are regulating well when what they are doing is suppressing efficiently. Both look like composure from the outside, and only one of them has a growing cost attached.
How do you process emotions in therapy?
Emotional processing in therapy follows a sequence that a clinician sets the pace for. First the feeling is located, often through bodily state rather than through language, which is the slow part for anyone with alexithymia. Then contact is deliberately extended past the point where the habitual escape would normally fire, whether that escape is analysis, humour or changing the subject. Then the meaning attached to the emotion is examined while it is still live, because that is when it is available to change. Sessions are closed deliberately so the person leaves regulated rather than opened up, and none of this is designed to be run alone between appointments.
Can therapy help if I cannot name what I feel?
Difficulty naming feeling states has a clinical name, alexithymia, and it is common rather than unusual. A 2008 study of 1,859 adults in the German general population found ten percent scored above the standard cutoff on the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, and it is measured on a dimension rather than diagnosed in the DSM-5-TR. For senior professionals the trait is often reinforced by an environment that rewards reporting facts over reactions. Therapy in this situation starts with vocabulary rather than with technique, built upward from physical sensation and behaviour, and a clinician who begins by asking you to describe an emotion you cannot access has started in the wrong place.
How long does emotional processing work take?
Length depends on which approach is being used and on how much groundwork is needed first. Exposure-based treatment for post-traumatic stress typically runs eight to fifteen weekly sessions according to the VA National Center for PTSD. Structured emotion-regulation training is usually delivered across a defined short course with practice between sessions. Emotion-focused and experiential work is less fixed, because the pace is set by how quickly contact with a held feeling becomes tolerable. High achievers who arrive with years of suppression behind them should expect the early weeks to be spent on naming rather than on processing, and that phase is not wasted time.
How does your private-pay pricing structure work?
As a private-pay concierge network, we offer structured investments in your mental health without the restrictions or privacy risks of insurance. You can review our full fee schedule and specific session lengths directly on our website. While this costs more than insurance copays, it provides the flexibility, total privacy, and highly specialized care that standard options cannot offer. View our current rates here.
How do you protect my privacy?
Privacy is foundational to our network. As a private-pay network, your sessions never appear on insurance records or EOBs that could be seen by employers, boards, or family members. We use HIPAA-compliant nationwide telehealth platforms, and you can attend sessions from anywhere with a private internet connection.
§09 / 09 / Begin
You do not have to know what you feel to begin.
Not being able to name it is a common starting point, not a disqualification. CEREVITY is a nationwide network of independent licensed clinicians providing confidential, private-pay care across all 50 states. Call (562) 295-6650 or send a private inquiry.
Available by appointment 7 days a week, 8 AM to 8 PM (PST)§§ / Author
About Martha Fernandez, LCSW.
Martha Fernandez, LCSW
Martha Fernandez, LCSW is Co-Founder of CEREVITY and a Licensed Clinical Social Worker licensed in California, seeing clients by telehealth nationwide through CEREVITY's network of independent licensed clinicians. USC-trained and bilingual in English and Spanish, she works with founders, executives, attorneys and pilots on burnout, anxiety and depression in high performers, on trauma, grief and high-stakes transitions, and on couples and relationship strain under pressure. Her clinical work draws on cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, behavioral activation, and narrative and solution-focused approaches. She is the author of Wired to Burn. View full bio →
§§ / Sources
References.
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for PTSD. Prolonged Exposure (PE) for PTSD. 2025. ptsd.va.gov
- StatPearls Publishing. Trauma-Informed Therapy. 2024. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Frontiers in Psychiatry. The clinical significance of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression across positive and negative emotions. 2025. frontiersin.org
- PLOS ONE. Affect regulation training reduces symptom severity in depression: a randomized controlled trial. 2019. journals.plos.org
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. Alexithymia in the German general population. 2008. link.springer.com
- CEREVITY. Frequently asked questions. cerevity.com/faq
- CEREVITY. Imposter syndrome therapy. cerevity.com/imposter-syndrome-therapy
- CEREVITY. Individual therapy. cerevity.com/individual-therapy
⚠ Crisis resources
If you are experiencing a mental health crisis or having thoughts of suicide, please reach out immediately. 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline · Call or text 988 Crisis Text Line · Text HOME to 741741 National Alliance on Mental Illness · 1-800-950-NAMI (6264)
