Schema Therapy Online: Rewriting Patterns · CEREVITY
Knowledge Base / How Therapy Works / August 2026
Start Therapy

Therapist Insights / How Therapy Works

Schema therapy online rewrites what keeps repeating.

Schema therapy leans on the room harder than almost any other approach. Imagery with the eyes closed, two chairs and a clinician willing to be a steady presence rather than a neutral one. Moving that onto a screen is not a formatting decision. It changes what can be seen, what can be staged, and where the session ends.

THE QUICK TAKEAWAY

Schema therapy works on early maladaptive schemas, the enduring patterns Jeffrey Young grouped into five domains, rather than on this month's symptoms. Its three signature techniques, imagery rescripting, chair work and limited reparenting, all depend on presence, which is why the delivery question is the one worth asking. CEREVITY clinicians run schema work over secure video with high achievers and professionals, and the honest position is that the technique adaptations are well developed while a trial of the therapy delivered by videoconference has not been published.

§01 / 09 / Definition

What the model actually names.

Schema therapy names three things and keeps them separate: early maladaptive schemas, coping styles, and modes. Jeffrey Young's model sets out eighteen schemas across five domains, three coping styles, and a set of moment-to-moment states. CEREVITY clinicians use that vocabulary because it gives high achievers a way to describe a pattern instead of a mood.

Most approaches name the problem after the symptom. Schema therapy names it after the pattern. Jeffrey Young built the model for people who completed a short structured course, improved, and then reassembled into exactly the shape they arrived in, and the vocabulary he built is unusually precise for a talking therapy. A 2024 review in Frontiers in Psychology sets the structure out plainly: eighteen early maladaptive schemas in the original model, organised into five domains, which it names as disconnection and rejection, impaired autonomy, impaired limits, other-directedness, and over-vigilance and inhibition. That same review notes a later revision proposing twenty rather than eighteen, which is worth knowing before anyone quotes the number as settled. Beneath the schemas sit three coping styles, surrender, avoidance and overcompensation, and above them sit modes, the states a person actually arrives in. A 2016 paper in the same journal describes modes as relatively independently organised patterns of thinking, feeling and behaving, and describes the coping styles in mode form: compliant surrender, the detached protector, and a set of overcompensating modes including the self-aggrandizer. High achievers and professionals usually recognise the mode language first, because it explains how the person who chaired a board at eleven cannot answer a message at four.

Six things a screen changes about this work

01

The room becomes the client's own room

In an office, the setting is neutral by design. On video the imagery work happens in the home study or the parked car, which is often the exact place the pattern fires. That is a complication and an opportunity at the same time, and it has to be planned rather than discovered.

02

Eye contact stops being mutual

Looking at a face on screen means not looking at the lens, so nobody is ever quite meeting anybody. Attunement has to be carried more in voice, pacing and explicit naming than in the steady look that does a lot of quiet work in a consulting room.

03

The session ends without a corridor

Schema work opens material that takes twenty minutes to settle. An office gives you a hallway, a lift and a drive. A laptop gives you a kitchen, immediately, and sometimes a calendar invitation two minutes later.

04

Avoidance gains new equipment

Coping styles use whatever the environment offers. Over video, avoidance can look like a camera that stays off, a connection that keeps failing at the same point in the hour, or a reschedule that takes one tap and no explanation to anybody's face.

05

Chair work has to be re-staged

Two chairs in one frame, a camera that turns, a client who stands up and moves out of shot deliberately. The physical separation between modes is the active ingredient, so it gets rebuilt on purpose rather than abandoned because the furniture is wrong.

06

Distance stops limiting who you can work with

A course of this kind runs for years, not weeks, and clinicians trained in the model are unevenly distributed. Removing the commute removes one of the most common reasons long work quietly stops after month seven.

▶ Research

The evidence for schema therapy delivered over video is thinner than the confidence with which it is usually sold. The large controlled work was delivered in person: a 2014 design paper in BMC Psychiatry set out an international multicentre randomised trial recruiting a minimum of 448 patients across fourteen centres in six countries, randomising them to intensive group schema therapy, combined group and individual schema therapy, or treatment as usual, all over two years. The only published study of an internet-delivered schema therapy program is a 2018 single-arm naturalistic study of thirteen patients using a web-based self-help tool alongside weekly face-to-face appointments, described by its authors as the first study of a web-based schema therapy tool. Neither tests the therapy itself conducted by videoconference, and CEREVITY has found no published trial that does.1

Where the method and the medium actually collide

Imagery is harder to steady and easier to interrupt

Imagery rescripting activates a schema together with its original feeling, and a 2016 Frontiers in Psychology paper describes it as connecting that activation to biographical memory so it can be reprocessed with therapeutic support. The support is the operative word. On screen the clinician cannot lean in, and a delivery van at the wrong moment ends the sequence.

Chair work is a staging problem, not an impossibility

The technique works because two modes stop sharing one voice and one body position. That separation can be produced with a second seat inside the frame, a camera that gets turned, or a client who physically stands and speaks from a different place in the room. What it cannot survive is being reduced to a conversation about two chairs.

Rupture goes quieter

Empathic confrontation, described in the same 2016 paper as balancing validation of a dysfunctional coping mode with a push for change, produces friction on purpose. In an office the withdrawal that follows is visible. On video it looks like a pause, and it can be ended entirely with one click, which means repair has to be initiated earlier and more explicitly.

A camera carries a face. What it cannot carry is a corridor, and this is the kind of work that needs somewhere to walk afterwards.

Three things that exist in a video session and not in an office

Comparisons between virtual and in-person therapy usually focus on what the screen subtracts. For schema work the more useful list is what the screen adds, because each of these three is a real variable that a clinician can either manage or ignore.

01

A frame with edges

The camera crops the body at the collarbone. Hands, feet, the shift of weight in a chair and the flinch that arrives half a second before the words are all outside the picture unless someone widens it deliberately. Schema clinicians who work well on video ask for a wider shot before imagery, not after.

02

A room the clinician did not choose

Every video session takes place somewhere with a history. Doing imagery about a critical parent in the house that parent paid for is not the same exercise as doing it in a rented consulting room, and pretending otherwise wastes the difference.

03

The hour after the call

In-person therapy builds a transition into the geography. Virtual therapy has to build it into the agreement: what you do for the next thirty minutes, what you do not schedule, and who, if anyone, knows you were in a session.

§02 / 09 / Telehealth

Why delivery is the real question.

Schema therapy depends on the room more than most approaches do. Imagery rescripting asks a client to close their eyes for long stretches, chair work asks them to move between physical positions, and limited reparenting asks the clinician to be a steady presence rather than a blank one. CEREVITY treats the move to video as a clinical design problem for professionals, not a scheduling convenience.

A

A long course survives a real calendar

The published trials of schema therapy run for two years. A 2014 BMC Psychiatry design paper for an international multicentre randomised trial specifies either 118 group sessions over two years, or 63 group sessions plus 61 individual sessions over the same period. Attrition across a commitment that size is rarely about motivation. Removing travel removes the most common practical reason it stops.

B

Matching happens on training, not on postcode

Clinicians trained in this specific model are not evenly spread across the country. Working over secure video means a person in a small market can be matched to someone who actually runs imagery and chair work, rather than to the nearest generalist who has read about them.

C

The pattern gets observed where it lives

A schema fires in context. When the session happens at the desk where the emails arrive, the clinician sees the shift in real time instead of hearing a reconstruction of it a week later. That is a genuine gain, and it belongs in the honest column alongside the losses.

§03 / 09 / Mechanism

What a screen changes.

Video changes four things in schema therapy: what the clinician can see, how imagery is steadied, how chair work is staged, and where the session ends. CEREVITY clinicians design around all four rather than assuming the office version of the work transfers intact for the professionals they see.

Start with sight, because everything else follows from it. A consulting room gives a clinician the whole person: the foot that starts moving before the voice changes, the hands that go still, the moment someone stops breathing out fully. A laptop camera gives a head and a pair of shoulders in a fixed rectangle, usually lit from behind by a window. Before an imagery sequence, an experienced schema clinician will ask for the camera to be moved back so the upper body is in shot, and will say why. That request is not fussiness. Imagery rescripting works on activated emotion, and the signals that tell a clinician when to slow down, when to add support and when to stop are mostly below the collarbone. Where the shot cannot be widened, the tracking moves into language: the clinician asks out loud what is happening in the chest and the jaw, at intervals, and the client learns to report rather than to be read. That is a slower instrument, and pretending it is the same instrument is where virtual schema work goes wrong.

Then there is the question of what happens when the eyes close. In imagery work a client may spend fifteen or twenty minutes with their eyes shut while a memory is entered, held and changed. In a room, the clinician's presence is ambient and continuous. On a screen, the moment the eyes close the client is alone in their own house with a voice coming out of a speaker. Good practice compensates deliberately: an agreed signal for stop, a slightly more frequent voice, a named object in the present room to return to, and a spoken close that brings the client back before the connection is anywhere near ending. Household risk gets planned too. A locked door, a note, headphones, a phone on do not disturb, and an explicit agreement about what happens if someone walks in. Where a whole household is caught up in the same patterns, and it often is, when a demanding job reshapes life at home is a separate piece of work rather than something to solve inside a schema session.

The last change is the one clients raise least and feel most. Schema work opens the vulnerable mode on purpose, and it does not close instantly. An office builds a decompression sequence into the architecture without anyone designing it: you stand up, you walk out, you sit in traffic. A video session ends and you are in your own kitchen, or worse, back in the calendar you were in ninety seconds earlier. CEREVITY clinicians treat the following half hour as part of the session rather than as free time, which usually means no meeting scheduled immediately afterwards, a short physical routine agreed in advance, and permission to be unproductive for a while. For people whose patterns show up hardest in rooms where the consequences are large, that boundary is doing similar work to how clinicians work with anxiety that shows up only when the consequences are enormous: the point is to stop the state from leaking into the next high-stakes hour.

► Standard advice vs. CEREVITY's approach

Standard therapy

"Treat video as the office session with the travel removed"

CEREVITY

"Redesign the imagery, the staging and the ending for a screen"

Standard therapy

"Drop chair work because there is only one chair on camera"

CEREVITY

"Rebuild the physical separation between modes inside the frame"

Standard therapy

"Book the next call for two minutes after the session ends"

CEREVITY

"Protect the half hour afterwards as part of the appointment"

► Standard insurance-based therapy vs. CEREVITY's specialized approach for High achievers and professionals
Standard insurance-based therapyCEREVITY's specialized approach
"Treat video as the office session with the travel removed""Redesign the imagery, the staging and the ending for a screen"
"Drop chair work because there is only one chair on camera""Rebuild the physical separation between modes inside the frame"
"Book the next call for two minutes after the session ends""Protect the half hour afterwards as part of the appointment"

A break from the page

The design of the hour matters as much as the method.

A first conversation is confidential and commits you to nothing. CEREVITY is a nationwide network of independent licensed clinicians working private-pay, with no insurance claim submitted. Read how a long course is planned before it begins, or start with a private inquiry.

§04 / 09 / Cases

Common challenges we address.

The professional whose camera is always slightly off

The patternSessions that begin four minutes late with an apology about the connection. A camera angled at the ceiling, or off entirely, on the weeks the material was going to be difficult. Everything is explained by bandwidth and nothing is explained by bandwidth.

What we addressRather than treating this as a technical problem, the work names it as the coping style operating in the medium, and then makes it the material. The same avoidance shows up in the one-to-one hour itself, which is why it is worth catching early rather than tolerating for a year.

The client who books schema work between two meetings

The patternAn 11am imagery session with a 12pm review immediately after it. The session goes well, the person performs competently at noon, and by Thursday they cannot remember what was worked on. Repetition without consolidation produces a long course that never accumulates.

What we addressThe fix is structural rather than clinical: a protected hour afterwards, a session length matched to the technique, and a written record the client makes themselves. Where the calendar genuinely cannot hold that shape, what it means to keep a clinician on retainer rather than booking session by session is the honest alternative to pretending the schedule works.

§05 / 09 / Methods

Evidence-based treatment approaches.

Five named techniques carry schema therapy: imagery rescripting, chair work, limited reparenting, empathic confrontation, and cognitive plus behavioural pattern-breaking. Each behaves differently on a screen, and CEREVITY clinicians adapt the staging rather than dropping the technique when high achievers work remotely.

Modality 01

Imagery rescripting, segmented for video

A memory is entered with the eyes closed, held with its original feeling, and then changed so the meaning shifts rather than the facts. On video the sequence is shortened and segmented, the clinician speaks more often to hold continuity, an agreed stop signal is set before starting, and the return to the present room is done deliberately rather than allowed to happen when the call drops.

Modality 02

Chair work and mode dialogues

Different modes are given different physical positions so the demanding internal voice and the part it targets stop occupying the same body. Remotely this needs staging: a second seat brought into shot, a camera that is turned, or a client who stands and speaks from a marked spot. Naming which position is speaking, out loud, replaces the visual cue an observer would otherwise get for free.

Modality 03

Limited reparenting, and what it is not

A bounded professional stance in which the clinician meets, within the limits of the therapy relationship, core emotional needs that went unmet earlier. A 2018 PLOS ONE study of patients who had received at least twelve months of schema therapy describes it as providing corrective experiences within professional boundaries. It is not friendship, it is not availability at all hours, and it is not a substitute parent. On video it is carried by consistency, warmth in voice, and boundaries that are stated rather than assumed.

Modality 04

Empathic confrontation

Validating why a coping style made sense while stating plainly what it now costs. The 2016 Frontiers in Psychology account describes it as balancing emotional validation of a dysfunctional coping mode with a push for change through reality testing. Because withdrawal after confrontation is much harder to read on a screen, the clinician checks the effect explicitly in the same session instead of waiting to see what arrives next week.

Modality 05

Cognitive and behavioural pattern-breaking

Building the evidence against a schema, then acting against the coping style in daily life, which for someone who overcompensates by working harder tends to mean deliberately under-delivering once and sitting with the result. Flashcards and mode diaries move to shared documents or a phone album, which makes them more available in the moment and easier for the clinician to review with the client on screen.

§06 / 09 / Investment

Understanding the investment in private-pay care.

Private-pay, nationwide, and planned for a long course

At CEREVITY, our online individual therapy sessions are structured as a direct investment in your mental agility and overall well-being. The investment includes:

  • Licensed mental health professional specializing in schema therapy delivered over secure video
  • Evidence-based, one-on-one approaches proven effective for depression, perfectionism, and repeating patterns
  • Flexible online scheduling including evenings and weekends
  • Complete privacy with no insurance involvement or red tape
  • High achievers and professionals expertise and understanding
  • Outcome tracking and progress measurement
View rates & investment options

The cost of schema therapy online going unaddressed

Consider what is at stake when schema therapy online goes unaddressed:

What the dose implies before anyone commits

The trials that produced the strongest results delivered two years of treatment, which is a different financial and personal commitment from a twelve-week protocol, and saying so up front is more useful than implying a short course reproduces published outcomes. Working outside of insurance means the length of the work is a clinical decision rather than an authorisation decision, which matters more here than in almost any other approach. View our current rates here: cerevity.com/our-pricing-for-therapy/.

Formats, paperwork and access

Sessions are delivered by secure telehealth nationwide across all 50 states. Imagery and chair work often sit badly inside a 50-minute session because the technique needs a run-up and a landing, so extended 90-minute sessions are common once the work moves into experiential territory. Paperwork is set out under billing, receipts and reimbursement if you intend to file out of network yourself, and the full range of services covers what else sits alongside this work. Practical questions about scheduling and privacy are answered in the questions people ask before starting.

§07 / 09 / Evidence

What the research shows.

The honest summary has two parts, and most pages selling virtual schema therapy give you only the first. Part one: the model itself is well specified and its strongest outcome evidence comes from long, controlled, in-person treatment for personality disorders. A 2014 design paper in BMC Psychiatry describes an international multicentre randomised trial across fourteen centres in six countries, recruiting a minimum of 448 patients with borderline personality disorder, randomised to intensive group schema therapy, combined group and individual schema therapy, or treatment as usual, all delivered over two years with follow-up a year after that. A 2018 PLOS ONE study interviewed 36 people who had received at least twelve months of schema therapy and found that imagery rescripting and chair work were experienced as helpful even though they were difficult at first, that the mode model gave people a usable way to categorise what was happening to them, and that half the participants described the two-year program as insufficient for patterns that had run for decades.

► What the format evidence actually rests on

448

patients minimum, across fourteen centres in six countries, randomised to two years of group or combined schema therapy or to treatment as usual.

BMC Psychiatry, 2014

36

patients with at least twelve months of schema therapy, interviewed about which techniques helped and what the two-year course missed.

PLOS ONE, 2018

13

patients in the only published study of a web-based schema therapy program, single-arm and used alongside weekly face-to-face sessions.

JMIR Mental Health, 2018

Three studies with different designs and different questions. Two describe in-person treatment; the third is the only published study of an internet-delivered schema therapy program.

Part two is the part that concerns anyone searching for this online. No published trial has tested schema therapy delivered by videoconference. The nearest evidence is a 2018 JMIR Mental Health naturalistic single-arm study of thirteen patients using priovi, a web-based self-help program built on the schema mode model, which its authors describe as the first study of a web-based schema therapy tool and which was used alongside weekly individual face-to-face sessions rather than instead of them. Thirteen patients in an uncontrolled study is a starting point, not a finding, and the same paper notes that some exercises provoked mild anxiety. What a professional weighing this up should take from it is not that virtual schema therapy has been disproved, because it has not been tested. It is that anyone promising equivalence is asserting something the literature does not yet contain, and that the reasonable position is a well-argued inference held loosely and reviewed as the work goes on.

§§ / 09 / Recap

Key takeaways.

Six things to remember

  1. The vocabulary is precise, so use it precisely Eighteen early maladaptive schemas across five domains, three coping styles, and modes as moment-to-moment states. A 2024 review notes a proposed revision to twenty schemas, so the number is a convention rather than a constant.
  2. The techniques transfer, the staging does not Imagery rescripting, chair work and empathic confrontation all survive the move to video. What has to be rebuilt is the camera framing, the physical separation between modes, and the way the clinician tracks a body they can only partly see.
  3. Limited reparenting is bounded, not blurred A clinician meeting core emotional needs within professional boundaries is a technique inside a therapy frame. Friendship, unlimited availability and substitute parenting are none of those things, and confusing them is how this model gets practised badly.
  4. Plan the hour after the call Virtual delivery removes the corridor, the lift and the drive home. Without a designed transition, schema work leaks into the next meeting, which is both unpleasant and a fast way to stop doing the work honestly.
  5. Nobody has tested this over video yet The controlled trials ran in person over two years. The only internet-delivered schema therapy study is single-arm with thirteen patients. Treat virtual delivery as reasoned practice rather than proven equivalence.
  6. CEREVITY provides this through online individual therapy nationwide, with full privacy through its private-pay concierge network and no insurance involvement.

§08 / 09 / FAQ

Frequently asked questions.

Does schema therapy work online?

Schema therapy is being delivered over secure video widely, and the honest answer separates practice from proof. No randomised trial of schema therapy conducted by videoconference has been published, so nobody can claim demonstrated equivalence with the in-person trials. What can be said is that the techniques have workable remote versions: imagery is shortened and segmented with an agreed stop signal, chair work is re-staged inside the camera frame, and limited reparenting is carried through consistency and voice. CEREVITY clinicians work this way with high achievers and professionals across all 50 states and treat it as reasoned clinical practice held under review, not as a settled finding.

What is imagery rescripting in schema therapy?

Imagery rescripting asks a client to re-enter a formative memory with the eyes closed, feel what it originally carried, and then alter what happens inside it, so that what the memory means changes while the record of events does not. A 2016 Frontiers in Psychology paper describes the technique as activating a schema together with its associated emotion and connecting it to biographical memory so it can be reprocessed with therapeutic support. Over video that support has to be more audible and more frequent, because the clinician cannot lean in and the client cannot see anyone once their eyes are shut. CEREVITY clinicians agree a stop signal and a return sequence before the first attempt with any professional they work with.

What is chair work in schema therapy?

Chair work gives different schema modes different physical positions so that the demanding internal critic and the part it attacks stop speaking from the same seat and the same voice. Separating them in space is what makes the dialogue possible. Remotely this needs staging rather than abandoning: a second chair brought into the shot, a camera that gets turned, or a client who stands and speaks from a marked spot in the room. CEREVITY clinicians also name which position is speaking out loud, which replaces the visual cue that would otherwise be obvious to anyone sitting in the room with you.

What is limited reparenting in schema therapy?

Limited reparenting is a bounded professional stance in which the clinician deliberately meets, within the limits of the therapy relationship, core emotional needs that went unmet in childhood. A 2018 PLOS ONE study of patients who had received at least twelve months of schema therapy describes it as providing emotionally corrective experiences within professional boundaries. The word limited is doing real work. This is not friendship, not availability at all hours, and not a substitute parent, and a clinician who lets it drift into any of those has stopped practising the model. CEREVITY clinicians state those boundaries explicitly at the start, which matters more over video, where the usual physical markers of a professional setting are absent.

Is schema therapy good for borderline personality disorder?

Borderline personality disorder is where the schema therapy evidence is strongest and where the large controlled trials were run. A 2014 design paper in BMC Psychiatry set out an international multicentre randomised trial across fourteen centres in six countries, recruiting at least 448 patients and randomising them to intensive group schema therapy, combined group and individual schema therapy, or treatment as usual over two years. That is a serious evidence base by psychotherapy standards, and it is also a two-year dose delivered in person. CEREVITY clinicians treat that distinction as material rather than pedantic, because most people asking about schema therapy online are asking about a different condition and a different format.

What are schema modes?

Schema modes are the states a person is actually in at a given moment, as opposed to the stable schemas underneath. A 2016 Frontiers in Psychology paper describes them as relatively independently organised patterns of thinking, feeling and behaving. In borderline presentations the commonly described modes include a vulnerable child mode, an angry or impulsive child mode, a punitive parent mode, a detached protector mode, and healthier adult modes. High achievers and professionals often find this the most immediately useful part of the model, because it explains state switching that otherwise looks like inconsistency, and because a mode can be addressed in a session while a lifelong trait cannot.

What happens in the hour after a video session ends?

Schema sessions open material deliberately, and closing a laptop does not close it. In an office the walk out, the lift and the journey home give the nervous system twenty or thirty minutes to settle before anything is required of you. Virtual delivery removes all of that, so CEREVITY clinicians build the transition into the agreement instead: nothing scheduled immediately afterwards, a short physical routine agreed in advance, water, daylight, and permission to be unproductive for a while. High achievers and professionals resist this part more than any other, and it is usually the single change that makes a long course sustainable rather than exhausting.

How does your private-pay pricing structure work?

As a private-pay concierge network, we offer structured investments in your mental health without the restrictions or privacy risks of insurance. You can review our full fee schedule and specific session lengths directly on our website. While this costs more than insurance copays, it provides the flexibility, total privacy, and highly specialized care that standard options cannot offer. View our current rates here.

How do you protect my privacy?

Privacy is foundational to our network. As a private-pay network, your sessions never appear on insurance records or EOBs that could be seen by employers, boards, or family members. We use HIPAA-compliant nationwide telehealth platforms, and you can attend sessions from anywhere with a private internet connection.

§09 / 09 / Begin

The pattern is older than the job. It is still workable.

If the same collapse arrives after every win, the win is not the variable. CEREVITY is a nationwide network of independent licensed clinicians providing confidential, private-pay care across all 50 states. Call (562) 295-6650 or send a private inquiry.

Available by appointment 7 days a week, 8 AM to 8 PM (PST)

§§ / Author

About Martha Fernandez, LCSW.

Martha Fernandez, LCSW

Martha Fernandez, LCSW

Martha Fernandez, LCSW is Co-Founder of CEREVITY and a Licensed Clinical Social Worker licensed in California, seeing clients by telehealth nationwide through CEREVITY's network of independent licensed clinicians. USC-trained and bilingual in English and Spanish, she works with founders, executives, attorneys and pilots on burnout, anxiety and depression in high performers, on trauma, grief and high-stakes transitions, and on couples and relationship strain under pressure. Her clinical work draws on cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, behavioral activation, and narrative and solution-focused approaches. She is the author of Wired to Burn. View full bio →

CredentialLCSW, Licensed Clinical Social Worker
Years in practice8 years
SpecializationPsychotherapy for executives, entrepreneurs, and healthcare professionals; trauma-informed care
ModalitiesCBT, EMDR, somatic-informed, psychodynamic
Author licensureLicensed by the California Board of Behavioral Sciences
Who you would seeA clinician independently licensed in your own state, through CEREVITY's nationwide network across all 50 states

§§ / Sources

References.

  1. Frontiers in Psychology. Understanding early maladaptive schemas in autistic and ADHD individuals: exploring the impact, changing the narrative, and schema therapy considerations. 2024. frontiersin.org
  2. Frontiers in Psychology. Schema Therapy for Emotional Dysregulation: Theoretical Implication and Clinical Applications. 2016. frontiersin.org
  3. BMC Psychiatry. Design of an international multicentre RCT on group schema therapy for borderline personality disorder. 2014. link.springer.com
  4. PLOS ONE. Schema therapy for borderline personality disorder: A qualitative study of patients' perceptions. 2018. journals.plos.org
  5. JMIR Mental Health. A Schema Therapy-Based eHealth Program for Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (priovi): Naturalistic Single-Arm Observational Study. 2018. mental.jmir.org
  6. CEREVITY. Payment options. cerevity.com/payment-options
  7. CEREVITY. Our services. cerevity.com/services
  8. CEREVITY. Concierge therapy membership. cerevity.com/concierge-therapy-membership

⚠ Crisis resources

If you are experiencing a mental health crisis or having thoughts of suicide, please reach out immediately. 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline · Call or text 988 Crisis Text Line · Text HOME to 741741 National Alliance on Mental Illness · 1-800-950-NAMI (6264)

A nationwide private-pay concierge network of independent licensed clinicians.
© 2026 CEREVITY · (562) 295-6650