Therapist Insights / Trauma Treatment
Internet triggers for PTSD and what to change.
An open feed is the only environment most adults enter several times a day without any idea what is inside it. For someone already carrying post-traumatic stress, that is a meaningful design problem. The useful question is not whether the internet is bad for you. It is which specific exposures set your symptoms off, and which of them you can actually change without withdrawing from the world.
THE QUICK TAKEAWAY
PTSD is a DSM-5-TR diagnosis with a gatekeeping exposure criterion, and the fourth route into that criterion carries a note stating that it does not apply to exposure through electronic media, television, movies or pictures unless the exposure is work related. Doomscrolling therefore does not itself meet the exposure criterion for a member of the public. What online exposure demonstrably can do is reactivate and worsen symptoms in someone who already has post-traumatic stress, and that is the clinically credible subject. CEREVITY clinicians treat the feed as a controllable variable in the treatment plan rather than as the cause of the disorder.
§01 / 09 / Definition
What the diagnosis actually requires.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in DSM-5-TR requires exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury or sexual violence through one of four defined routes. The fourth route, repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details, carries a note excluding exposure through electronic media, television, movies or pictures unless it is work related.
Most writing about the internet and trauma starts in the wrong place. It describes a feeling, calls the feeling trauma, and stops there. The diagnosis is narrower than the word, and the narrowness turns out to be the most useful thing on offer to anyone trying to work out what is happening to them. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in DSM-5-TR opens with a gatekeeping criterion, Criterion A, which requires exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury or sexual violence through one of four specified routes: directly experiencing the event, witnessing it in person as it occurred to someone else, learning that it happened to a close family member or close friend where the death was violent or accidental, or experiencing repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details of the event. That fourth route is the one people reach for when they talk about the internet. It is also the one with a note attached, and the note is the single most misquoted sentence in this entire subject area. Criterion A4 does not apply to exposure through electronic media, television, movies or pictures, unless that exposure is work related. The StatPearls clinical reference, last updated in February 2024, states the same boundary in its own words: indirect exposure means professionals repeatedly exposed to details such as child abuse, collecting human remains or handling evidence, and it does not include exposure through television, movies, electronic devices or pictures.
Five things the criteria settle that a headline does not
The event has to be a specific kind of event
Criterion A names actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence. Genuine distress at a cruel comment thread, a hostile quote tweet or an alarming economic forecast does not meet that bar. The distress is real. The category is different, and treating it as post-traumatic stress sends people toward the wrong treatment.
The route has to be one of the four listed
Direct experience, in-person witnessing, learning of a violent or accidental death in a close relationship, or repeated and extreme exposure to aversive details. There is no fifth route, and no general clause for anything that felt overwhelming.
The media carve-out sits inside the fourth route
The exclusion is written into the criterion itself rather than added as commentary. Scrolling footage of a disaster, however much of it and however graphic, is not the exposure route the manual describes, unless reviewing that footage is your job.
Work-related exposure is treated as a different case
Content moderators, journalists reviewing raw footage, investigators, dispatchers and clinicians handling case material sit on the other side of that clause. The manual anticipated exactly this population, and the research on it is thinner than the population deserves.
The exposure criterion is only the entry point
Meeting Criterion A settles nothing on its own. A diagnosis also requires intrusion symptoms, persistent avoidance, negative changes in thought and mood, and marked changes in arousal and reactivity, all lasting longer than a month and causing real impairment in daily functioning.
▶ Research
The most important sentence in this subject is one almost nobody quotes. Criterion A4 in DSM-5-TR covers experiencing repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details of a traumatic event, and it carries an explicit note: it does not apply to exposure through electronic media, television, movies, or pictures, unless this exposure is work related. Read carefully, that clause does two things at once. It rules out the claim that consuming distressing footage on a personal device meets the diagnostic threshold for a member of the public. And it deliberately leaves the door open for people whose job is that footage, which is why a content moderator, a newsroom video verifier, an investigator or a dispatcher is not covered by the same reasoning as someone scrolling on a sofa.1
What the distinction changes in practice
Naming it correctly changes what gets treated
If the presentation is post-traumatic stress being reactivated, the treatment targets the traumatic memory, and screen habits are managed alongside it as a pacing decision. If the presentation is sustained anxiety fed by news consumption without a qualifying trauma history, the treatment is different work entirely. Mislabeling sends people into protocols built for a mechanism they do not have.
Every study describes a population, and the population is the finding
The Boston Marathon research describes United States adults after a collective traumatic event. The secondary traumatic stress literature describes people paid to review aversive material. Neither describes the general habit of scrolling through bad news on an ordinary week, and quoting either as though it did is the most common error in popular coverage of this topic.
Prospective is stronger than cross-sectional, and still not causal
Following the same nationally representative sample from two weeks after an event to six months later is a considerably better design than asking people once how much they scroll and how bad they feel. It still cannot license a headline that says media exposure causes post-traumatic stress disorder. What it supports is an association strong enough to act on, which is a lower bar and a more honest one.
Three separate claims that get collapsed into one
Almost every argument about the internet and trauma is an argument about which of three claims is being made. They have different evidence behind them, different clinical implications, and different answers. Keeping them apart is the first practical step for anyone trying to decide whether what they are experiencing needs treatment, needs a settings change, or needs both.
The internet gave me PTSD
For a member of the public consuming coverage on a personal device, this claim does not survive the exposure criterion in DSM-5-TR. That is a statement about how the diagnosis is defined, not a judgment about how bad someone feels. The definition exists so that a specific treatment can be aimed at a specific mechanism.
The internet is setting off symptoms I already have
This claim is clinically credible, extremely common, and the actual subject of this article. Reactivation of an existing post-traumatic stress presentation by an unexpected image, a piece of audio, a date, a name or an anniversary post is standard, well described, and treatable.
The internet is making me anxious and demoralized
Also real, also worth acting on, and not post-traumatic stress. Sustained low-grade dread from news consumption has its own literature and its own remedies. Calling it trauma inflates the language and, more damagingly, points people toward trauma-focused protocols that were built for something else.
§02 / 09 / Telehealth
Reactivating symptoms is not the same as causing the disorder.
Online exposure can measurably worsen symptoms in adults who already carry post-traumatic stress, and prospective research after collective traumatic events supports that. Causing the disorder in a member of the public through media consumption alone is a much stronger claim, and the DSM-5-TR exposure criterion does not support it.
Media exposure after a collective trauma tracks with worse outcomes
A prospective longitudinal study published in Clinical Psychological Science in 2019 surveyed a nationally representative United States sample, 4,675 respondents two to four weeks after the Boston Marathon bombings and 3,598 of them again six months later. Six hours or more of daily bombing-related media exposure in that first week was associated with higher acute stress than direct exposure to the bombings themselves. Exposure to graphic, bloody images predicted higher acute stress at the first wave and higher post-traumatic stress symptoms, more fear of future terrorism, and greater functional impairment six months on.
Work-related review of traumatic material is a genuinely different case
A 2024 paper in Communications Psychology sets out a model for secondary traumatic stress in analytical staff, the crime analysts, digital forensics analysts, intelligence analysts and content moderators whose work is repeated exposure to aversive material. The authors cite 25 percent of one internet crimes against children task force reporting high levels of secondary traumatic stress, and they state plainly that no prevalence studies exist for content moderators at all. That gap is the honest headline.
A trigger response is a flare, not a new injury
When an unexpected image sets off a wave of intrusion, racing pulse and a scramble to get away from the screen, the memory network being activated was already there. That is what makes the response fast, physical and largely pre-verbal. It is also what makes it treatable, because the target of treatment is the stored memory and its processing rather than the phone.
§03 / 09 / Mechanism
How a feed reaches a nervous system.
Online triggers reach adults with post-traumatic stress through a delivery system built for the opposite of preparation: autoplay video, engagement-ranked feeds, sound-on previews and notifications that arrive without context. The absence of warning is the mechanism, not the volume of content.
The distinctive feature of a feed is not that it contains distressing material. Newspapers contained distressing material. The distinctive feature is that the material arrives unannounced, at a moment you did not choose, in a format that starts moving before you have decided whether to look. Autoplay removes the decision. Ranking by engagement systematically promotes whatever produced the strongest reaction in other people, which correlates uncomfortably well with whatever is most graphic. Notifications relocate the encounter to whatever you happen to be doing when your phone buzzes. And the same device is a work tool, an alarm clock, a boarding pass and a family group chat, which means the encounter usually happens somewhere you have no ability to react: a lift, a client meeting, the school run, two in the morning.
What is actually happening in a trigger response is worth being precise about, because the precision is reassuring. A traumatic memory tends to be stored with strong sensory and contextual detail and comparatively poor placement in the timeline of a life. A cue that resembles part of that stored material, a sound, a make of car, a uniform, a phrase, a date on a calendar, can activate the network faster than deliberate thought can intervene. That is why the reaction is physical before it is verbal, and why people describe it as coming out of nowhere. It did not come out of nowhere. It came from a match, and the match happened to be delivered by an algorithm rather than by a street corner.
For adults carrying a demanding professional load, the phone is not optional, which changes the shape of the advice. Deleting everything is not a plan for someone whose team reaches them on the same device that delivers the footage. What is available is a set of narrower controls: turning off autoplay, muting by keyword, removing a single app from the home screen while keeping it on the device, moving news consumption to a fixed window in the day rather than the gaps between meetings, and reading rather than watching where a choice exists. None of that is avoidance in the clinical sense, and the distinction matters. Avoidance in post-traumatic stress means organizing your life around not encountering reminders, which narrows the life and keeps the disorder in place. Deliberate control over an exposure you did not choose is the opposite: it returns the decision to you. How CEREVITY approaches this work treats that difference as a clinical judgment made with a clinician, not a rule applied in advance.
► Standard advice vs. CEREVITY's approach
Standard therapy
"Decide the internet gave you post-traumatic stress and treat it accordingly"
CEREVITY
"Establish whether the exposure criterion is met, then treat what is actually there"
Standard therapy
"Delete every app and call the resulting quiet an improvement"
CEREVITY
"Change the specific settings that remove warning, and keep the life intact"
Standard therapy
"Read a study about one population as though it described everyone"
CEREVITY
"Ask who was in the sample before deciding what the finding applies to"
| Standard insurance-based therapy | CEREVITY's specialized approach |
|---|---|
| "Decide the internet gave you post-traumatic stress and treat it accordingly" | "Establish whether the exposure criterion is met, then treat what is actually there" |
| "Delete every app and call the resulting quiet an improvement" | "Change the specific settings that remove warning, and keep the life intact" |
| "Read a study about one population as though it described everyone" | "Ask who was in the sample before deciding what the finding applies to" |
A break from the page
The feed is a variable. The memory is the target.
A first inquiry is confidential and commits you to nothing. CEREVITY is a nationwide network of independent licensed clinicians working private-pay across all 50 states, with no insurance claim submitted and no diagnosis on a payer record. If online exposure keeps setting off something you have been managing alone, start with a private inquiry.
§04 / 09 / Cases
Common challenges we address.
The executive scrolling at two in the morning
The patternSomeone with a trauma history that has never been treated, a schedule that leaves no unclaimed hours, and a habit of reaching for the phone in the one part of the day when nobody needs anything. The scrolling is not the problem and is not random either. It is what the night looks like when there is nowhere else to put the material.
What we addressThe work usually has to address the isolation before it addresses the feed. Senior people frequently have no one inside the organization they can say any of this to, and the absence of that outlet is itself clinically significant. Finding support outside your organization is often the first thing that changes, and the sleep and the scrolling tend to move after it rather than before.
The professional whose job is the exposure
The patternContent moderators, video verification staff, investigators, dispatchers, plaintiff-side lawyers and clinicians who carry case material. This group sits on the work-related side of the DSM-5-TR clause, and the research base describing them is unusually thin. A 2024 Communications Psychology paper states outright that no prevalence studies exist for content moderators.
What we addressTwo things matter here. The first is that the exposure is often not negotiable, so the plan has to work around a dose that cannot be reduced to zero. The second is that nobody in this position should attempt exposure-based processing of that material on their own, using a workbook or a video, between shifts. Trauma-focused work is done with a trained clinician who is pacing it, and doing it unsupervised is the most reliable way to make things worse.
§05 / 09 / Methods
Evidence-based treatment approaches.
Guideline-recommended treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is a short and specific list. Version 4.0 of the VA and Department of Defense clinical practice guideline, issued in 2023, strongly recommends three individual manualized trauma-focused psychotherapies, and recommends a further set weakly. No app or feed setting appears on either list.
Cognitive Processing Therapy
A structured, manualized trauma-focused psychotherapy that works on the beliefs formed at the time of the event, the conclusions about safety, trust, control and blame that survived the event and now run the present. Strongly recommended in the 2023 VA and Department of Defense guideline. It suits people whose intrusive material is bound up with a verdict they reached about themselves, which is a common shape when the trigger arriving through a feed is a name or a story rather than an image.
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing
A trauma-focused protocol that pairs attention to the traumatic memory with bilateral stimulation, with the aim of changing how the memory is stored rather than arguing with its content. Also strongly recommended in the 2023 guideline. It is frequently the approach people have already heard of, and it is worth knowing that it earned that place on the same short list as the other two rather than as an alternative to them.
Prolonged Exposure
Graded, deliberate, therapist-paced contact with the memory and with the situations that have been avoided, until the response to them changes. The third of the three strongly recommended approaches. The word exposure does a lot of damage here: this is a planned clinical procedure with a clinician managing the pace, and it has nothing in common with forcing yourself to keep watching a video that is distressing you.
Written Exposure Therapy
A brief, structured writing-based protocol, carrying a weak recommendation in the 2023 guideline rather than a strong one. Its appeal for adults with post-traumatic stress and very little schedule is that it is short and highly structured. A weak recommendation means the evidence supports it less strongly than the first three, which is a fact worth having before choosing rather than after.
Present-Centered Therapy
A non-trauma-focused option, also weakly recommended in the 2023 guideline, that works on current life difficulties and coping rather than on processing the memory directly. It exists on the list for good reason. Some people are not in a position to begin trauma-focused work immediately, and a guideline-recognized alternative is better than an improvised one.
§06 / 09 / Investment
Understanding the investment in private-pay care.
Private-pay, nationwide, and paced to the presentation
At CEREVITY, our online individual therapy sessions are structured as a direct investment in your mental agility and overall well-being. The investment includes:
- Licensed mental health professional specializing in trauma treatment for adults carrying sustained professional load
- Evidence-based, one-on-one approaches proven effective for post-traumatic stress, trauma reactivation, and sustained anxiety
- Flexible online scheduling including evenings and weekends
- Complete privacy with no insurance involvement or red tape
- Adults with post-traumatic stress expertise and understanding
- Outcome tracking and progress measurement
The cost of internet triggers for PTSD going unaddressed
Consider what is at stake when internet triggers for PTSD goes unaddressed:
What working outside insurance changes here
Private-pay care means no claim submitted, no diagnosis recorded on a payer file, and no benefit design deciding how many sessions a course of trauma-focused work is allowed to run. For a diagnosis as documentation-sensitive as this one, that is not a small detail. Where reimbursement still matters, out-of-network reimbursement is worth understanding before you begin rather than afterwards. View our current rates here: cerevity.com/our-pricing-for-therapy/.
Formats that fit trauma-focused work
Care is delivered by secure telehealth nationwide across all 50 states. The guideline-recommended protocols are individual work, and individual therapy is where this material is handled. Steady weekly progress usually sits well in the 50-minute format, while processing-heavy sessions often need more room in one sitting. For people whose calendars make a fixed weekly slot unreliable, how the concierge membership works is worth reading, because an interrupted course of trauma-focused work is a clinical problem and not only a scheduling one.
§07 / 09 / Evidence
What the research shows.
The honest summary is that the evidence here is real, specific, and considerably narrower than the coverage suggests. On the diagnostic side, DSM-5-TR is unambiguous: the fourth exposure route excludes electronic media, television, movies and pictures unless the exposure is work related, and the StatPearls clinical reference restates the same boundary. On the outcomes side, a prospective longitudinal study of 4,675 United States adults after the Boston Marathon bombings found that six hours or more of daily bombing-related media exposure in the first week was associated with higher acute stress than direct exposure was, and that exposure to graphic images predicted higher post-traumatic stress symptoms and greater functional impairment six months later. Those two findings are not in tension. One describes what qualifies as a traumatic exposure; the other describes what heavy media exposure does to distress and functioning in a population that has just lived through a collective traumatic event.
► What the research actually reports
or more of daily bombing-related media exposure was associated with higher acute stress than direct exposure to the Boston Marathon bombings.
Clinical Psychological Science, 2019
of one internet crimes against children task force reported high levels of secondary traumatic stress from work-related exposure.
Communications Psychology, 2024
individual manualized trauma-focused psychotherapies are strongly recommended for post-traumatic stress disorder.
VA and Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline, 2023
On the occupational side the picture is thinner than it should be. The 2024 Communications Psychology model of secondary traumatic stress in analytical staff cites a quarter of one internet crimes against children task force reporting high levels of secondary traumatic stress, and states that no prevalence studies exist for content moderators at all. For treatment, the position is the clearest thing in the whole field: version 4.0 of the VA and Department of Defense clinical practice guideline strongly recommends individual, manualized, trauma-focused psychotherapy over medication, and names Cognitive Processing Therapy, Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing and Prolonged Exposure. Nothing about feed hygiene appears in any guideline, at any strength, and no responsible reading of this literature turns a settings change into a treatment.
§§ / 09 / Recap
Key takeaways.
Five things to remember
- The carve-out is the fact to hold onto DSM-5-TR excludes electronic media, television, movies and pictures from the fourth exposure route unless the exposure is work related. Doomscrolling does not meet the exposure criterion for a member of the public, and a content moderator or a journalist reviewing footage is a different case by design.
- Reactivation is the credible mechanism Online material setting off symptoms in someone who already carries post-traumatic stress is common, well described and treatable. That is a different claim from the internet creating the disorder, and it is the one worth acting on.
- Control the exposure without shrinking the life Autoplay off, keyword mutes, a fixed window for news, reading rather than watching. Those are decisions returned to you. Reorganizing your existence around never encountering a reminder is avoidance, and avoidance is part of what keeps the disorder running.
- Trauma-focused work is done with a clinician, never alone The three strongly recommended protocols are paced deliberately by someone trained to pace them. Attempting exposure-style processing from a workbook or a video between shifts is the most reliable way to make an already difficult week worse.
- CEREVITY provides this through online individual therapy nationwide, with full privacy through its private-pay concierge network and no insurance involvement.
§08 / 09 / FAQ
Frequently asked questions.
Can social media cause PTSD?
Social media consumption does not meet the exposure criterion for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as DSM-5-TR defines it, for a member of the public. The manual lists four routes into the diagnosis, and the fourth, repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details, carries an explicit note that it does not apply to exposure through electronic media, television, movies or pictures unless the exposure is work related. What social media clearly can do is set off and worsen symptoms in someone who already has post-traumatic stress, and heavy media exposure after a collective traumatic event has been associated with higher acute stress and worse functioning months later. Both things are true at once, and the difference between them decides what treatment is appropriate.
Is internet-induced PTSD a real diagnosis?
Internet-induced PTSD is not a recognized diagnostic category in DSM-5-TR, and no version of the manual contains it. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder has one set of criteria regardless of how the exposure occurred, beginning with actual or threatened death, serious injury or sexual violence through one of four defined routes. The phrase circulates because people are describing something genuine: distress, intrusive images, disturbed sleep and dread that followed a period of heavy online exposure. Those symptoms deserve assessment. What they usually need is an accurate name, because sustained anxiety fed by news consumption responds to different work than a reactivated traumatic memory does.
What are the most common PTSD triggers online?
Common online triggers reported by adults with post-traumatic stress cluster into a few predictable groups. Autoplaying video of violence, accidents or medical emergencies. Graphic still images, which research after the Boston Marathon bombings found were associated with worse outcomes than non-graphic chaotic imagery. Audio, particularly sirens, raised voices, gunfire or crying, which arrives before you can look away. Anniversary and memorial posts, which land on dates that already carry weight. Names, place names and courtroom coverage of similar events. And direct contact, including messages from a person connected to the original event. The shared feature is arrival without warning rather than the subject matter itself.
How do I avoid PTSD triggers online?
Unplanned online triggers are best reduced by a set of narrow settings changes rather than by a decision to disengage from the world. Turn off autoplay and video previews. Mute specific keywords, hashtags and accounts rather than whole platforms. Move news to one fixed window in the day instead of the gaps between meetings. Read rather than watch where a choice exists, because text lets you stop mid-sentence. Remove an app from the home screen without deleting the account. Adults with post-traumatic stress should know the clinical caveat: organizing your whole life around never meeting a reminder is avoidance, and avoidance is one of the things that keeps the disorder in place. Controlling an exposure you did not choose is different, and a clinician can help you tell which one you are doing.
Why does the news make me anxious when nothing happened to me?
News consumption produces genuine anxiety in people with no trauma history at all, and that is not a malfunction. Coverage is ranked and edited for the strongest reaction, arrives continuously, and offers almost no action you can take in response, which is a reliable recipe for dread. Distress of that kind is not post-traumatic stress and does not need trauma-focused treatment. Adults who find it is affecting sleep, concentration or mood over weeks rather than days are worth assessing properly, because sustained anxiety has its own effective treatments. Naming it accurately is the step that gets someone into the right work rather than the wrong one.
Do content moderators and journalists get PTSD from what they view?
Work-related review of traumatic material sits on the other side of the DSM-5-TR carve-out, which excludes media exposure from the fourth criterion unless that exposure is work related. Content moderators, video verification staff, investigators, dispatchers and crime analysts are therefore not covered by the same reasoning as a member of the public scrolling at home. A 2024 paper in Communications Psychology setting out a model of secondary traumatic stress in analytical staff cites a quarter of one internet crimes against children task force reporting high levels of secondary traumatic stress, and notes that no prevalence studies exist for content moderators at all. The exposure is recognized. The evidence base describing its scale is still being built.
Should I delete social media if I have PTSD?
Full deletion of social media helps some adults with post-traumatic stress and quietly harms others, which is why it is a clinical decision rather than a rule. A complete withdrawal can remove a genuine source of connection and can shade into the avoidance that maintains the disorder, particularly if it is one of several things being cut at once. Targeted changes usually achieve more: autoplay off, keyword mutes, a single fixed window for news. Where the account itself is the problem, for instance because it carries contact from someone connected to the original event, removing it is straightforward and sensible. CEREVITY clinicians treat that decision as part of the treatment plan, made with the person rather than prescribed to them.
How does your private-pay pricing structure work?
As a private-pay concierge network, we offer structured investments in your mental health without the restrictions or privacy risks of insurance. You can review our full fee schedule and specific session lengths directly on our website. While this costs more than insurance copays, it provides the flexibility, total privacy, and highly specialized care that standard options cannot offer. View our current rates here.
How do you protect my privacy?
Privacy is foundational to our network. As a private-pay network, your sessions never appear on insurance records or EOBs that could be seen by employers, boards, or family members. We use HIPAA-compliant nationwide telehealth platforms, and you can attend sessions from anywhere with a private internet connection.
§09 / 09 / Begin
Change the feed. Then treat the memory.
If something online keeps setting off a reaction you have been managing alone at two in the morning, the underlying material is worth treating properly. CEREVITY is a nationwide network of independent licensed clinicians providing confidential, private-pay care across all 50 states. Call (562) 295-6650 or send a private inquiry.
Available by appointment 7 days a week, 8 AM to 8 PM (PST)§§ / Author
About Lucia Hernandez, PhD.
Lucia Hernandez, PhD
Dr. Hernandez is a Licensed Psychologist providing therapy for executives, entrepreneurs, and high-achieving professionals. Her work integrates evidence-based cognitive and psychodynamic approaches with a culturally responsive lens, calibrated to the realities of high-responsibility careers. She sees clients via CEREVITY's nationwide telehealth network. View full bio →
§§ / Sources
References.
- StatPearls Publishing. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. 2024. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Trauma-Informed Care in Behavioral Health Services (Treatment Improvement Protocol 57): Diagnostic Criteria for PTSD. 2014. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Clinical Psychological Science. Media Exposure to Collective Trauma, Mental Health, and Functioning: Does It Matter What You See?. 2019. bpb-us-e2.wpmucdn.com
- Communications Psychology. A model for secondary traumatic stress following workplace exposure to traumatic material in analytical staff. 2024. nature.com
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Acute Stress Disorder: Quick Reference Guide, Version 4.0. 2023. healthquality.va.gov
- CEREVITY. Individual therapy. cerevity.com/individual-therapy
- CEREVITY. Leadership isolation therapy. cerevity.com/leadership-isolation-therapy
- CEREVITY. How CEREVITY approaches this work. cerevity.com/our-approach
⚠ Crisis resources
If you are experiencing a mental health crisis or having thoughts of suicide, please reach out immediately. 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline · Call or text 988 Crisis Text Line · Text HOME to 741741 National Alliance on Mental Illness · 1-800-950-NAMI (6264)
